BMPT/72 BR Topic

Just do what I do, skip it.

image

Well it is kinda of offtopic and I touched a lot of nerve for calling people out for buying overprice pixelated stuff. People don’t like being called out so… You know , maybe we deserve the undertier BMPT. Maybe the matchmaking was destined to be fucked

Stats from hundreds of thousands of games aren’t subjective.

Stats that showed ~60% WR and above average K/D and K/S that was only slightly worse than the Type 90 Fuji but better than TT Type 90s and better than the T-72B3M in February?

And BMPT-72 is only “performing worse” because it’s a new premium with tons of botters and genuine dogwater players who otherwise manage 0.5 K/D in anything else, i’d wager if it was played only by the same people sweats who abused the hell out of the TT BMPT, its stats would still be above 2A7Vs and close to 2A7HU’s, the 3rd and 2nd best MBTs in WT.

1 Like

It’s not really hard to establish 60% WR in a tier where your peers are almost non existent.
What does Germany have to offer there, VJTF and FlaRakRad ?
For the US it’s not that different either, IPM1, M1A1 and ADATS ?
I doubt it’s that hard to win when your main foes come from minor nations’ premium ODL spam.

Also, I have no idea why are you comparing it’s K/D to Fuji and Type 90 when they aren’t at the same BR.

All those sweats abusing TT BMPT but still can’t come close to stats of something like T58, which isn’t even talked about in here, probably because it isn’t in the right nation to activate “malding loops” for the forum crowd.

Premium BMPT is performing worse because it’s objectively a worse vehicle.

What ?
In March, TT BMPT at 11.3 had slightly higher stats than 2A7V at 12.7 and you’re here trying to place former at 12.7 ?

“BMPT/72 BR Topic” - I wonder why, maybe off-topic, and bringing it up as a “got ya” is just deflecting from the BMPTs? Go make a topic about it if you want to, since it clearly pisses you off.

In March, TT BMPT at 11.3 had slightly higher stats than 2A7V at 12.7 and you’re here trying to place former at 12.7 ?

Yep. I have it, it’s 12.7 material but artifically kept at a lower BR.

Also, I have no idea why are you comparing it’s K/D to Fuji and Type 90 when they aren’t at the same BR.

They’re 11.7, same BR as M1A1, which you brought up. They’re also some of the best 11.7s, competing with currently the BMPTs, and the M1A1 for top spot, and they’re losing.

I doubt it’s that hard to win when your main foes come from minor nations’ premium ODL spam.

It isn’t hard for them to win either at 12.7 where said premium ODL spam is non-existent. I put my BMPT-72 in my T-90M/BVM line-up and I’m not doing any worse there than at 11.3 lol, it’s just a really good vehicle that’s out of place, and pretending it can’t be at its deserved BR is either ignorance, bias, or both.

1 Like

TLDR: BMPT both versions can’t be underperformed.
Bringing noised data set to project the vehicle performance is twisted talk.

Care to elaborate how that is an argument for the BMPT?
If there are no other vehicles at 11.3 itll just be up or downtiered all the time and considering that non russian 11.3 had 848474 and 11.0 had 1557227 games while 11.7 had 5451688 games its safe to assume that the BMPTs played in 11.7 more than in 11.0 and under.
Not surprising considering a 47% russian playrate in 10.3
48% in 10.7
49% in 11.0
80% in 11.3
20% in 11.7
35% in 12.0
and 13% in 12.3
So yeah the BMPT already held its own despite probably having a ton of games in 11.7+ already.

4 Likes

So huh, is 11.7 unplayable now ?

Didn’t have the occasion to play top tier GRB these days, wanted to keep my sanity ngl

in august, people demanding that type 90 went to 11.7 because it’s unfair that it can face 10.3
but somehow BMPT-72 is fine

1 Like

That abomination shouldnt face any vehicles as long as Gaijin refuses to fix its blatantly broken damage mode.

6 Likes

You can’t abuse a tank that can take it.

2nd and 3rd best? Impossible

Why? Put the Strv 122B+ at rank 1 and thats a solid top 3

Abrams is definitely #1 followed by TKX then STRV PLSS. I’m wondering who said leo 2As are even reputable 💀

It’s debatable but people here regularly put the 2A7 variants into the top 3 with good reason

Lmao what, Abrams doesn’t even make it to top 5.

  1. 122B+
  2. 2A7HU
  3. 2A7V
  4. 122A/B
  5. Type 10

image

As long as you all are having fun I guess…

When saying in here I meant the forum as a whole, not this topic.
T58 is a fine example of how oppressive vehicles can go unnoticed just because they aren’t a part of a certain nation.

In your opinion.

And they can see 12.7s, unlike BMPTs.

Thanks for sharing your anecdote.

Pretending that it needs to be at 12.7 to be balanced is either ignorance, bias or both.

It was neither for nor against, just a quick reminder that achieving WRs in a tier where only your nation has a good lineup isn’t something special.

And your opinion is the opposite, obviously, considering you’re the rusmain lol.

Thanks for sharing your anecdote.

Thanks for sharing your speculations.

Pretending that it needs to be at 12.7 to be balanced is either ignorance, bias or both.

Well, not pretending, but rather first hand experience in it, can’t say the same for you ;)

You always defend anything russian without even breaking a sweat, after all, you’ve been doing that since the old forum :)

Always the same excuses, always the same “but what about this other thing”, and always acting like every argument against you is an anecdote or an opinion, man you haven’t changed in years, keep it up, maybe Gaijin will actually hire you to be their chief defender too :P

And they can see 12.7s, unlike BMPTs.

Yeah they can

When saying in here I meant the forum as a whole, not this topic.

And it’s called deflecting

3 Likes