I value my sanity. No thanks.
Mhm. You guys are all the same.
Right back at ya. Cope harder
They have to do something, now im tired of playing against it, it should be at 12.0 at least. Im done with Warthunder for a while.
They are most certainly not. the merkas have the same issue the Abrams does. the BMPT just sends so much shit at you it kills you thru the rings. not to mention you lose the barrel and its over and the merkas are a very large target. i find the booker to be a better counter. or anything that can sling spikes.
I know how to kill BMPT observe please.
First you need to light the tank on fire twice maybe even 3 times because it’s from hell and the crew sitting on the front is fireproof and very very brave Russian crew.
After death you QUICKLY go back and finish it off from the front before he drink more vodka.
Thank you all please leave BMPT alone, it is balanced and in no need of any changes.
#BMPTLivesMatter
#IStandWithBMPT
2 Likes
How can it be a backing plate when there are no backing plate? Chobham block just has a layer of some absorbant, same as any other composite armor.
Aside from the well-known properties of integrated liners that are bonded to the armor plate as well as graphite coated depleted uranium plates, the Burlington (Chobham-style) composite has an interior “skin” on these blocks which is a heavy, ductile metal plate designed to catch fragments and “mushroom” rather than shatter. But of course it’s easy to dismiss such well known material science (which has been thoroughly studied and applied in a practical sense since as early as the 1970s by the way) and make arguments in bad faith, because these armor compositions are highly classified information. Yet, we continue to see advanced armor and protection features that are added to some vehicles of a certain origin leading to disrupted gameplay balance, while their counterparts from their competing nations get left behind for some reason.
The T-90M2 would fix that… but that is yet to come 😅
We dont even know what T-90M2 will be.
They are claiming and testing different variants.
So they are part the “composite armor” block of the tank, and i believe included to the calculations of the armor of M1s.
Yes it is, but the spall reducing properties aren’t reflected in the game.
Why, then i believe they should reflect those somehow
1 Like
Depends, personally i haven’t had that many BMPTs go trough the turret ring, mostly because they are usually shooting the hull if they are on the side or rear, from the front i usually just get killed by the ATGM but even that sometimes doesn’t kill me
Not sure what’s good about the Booker as a counter since they can easily be killed trough the turret
Spikes usually hit some god awful area that doesn’t do any real damage to the BMPTs
Booker has just enough frontal armor to pretty reliably tank 30mm APDS at ~500m on the majority of the tank. Mantlet is ofc artificially made weak. No massive exposed turret ring like the abrams either which is helpful.