Do you have evidence BMPT is broken?
Without citing anecdotes like personal experience, or win rate. ;)
Winrate is not a personal anecdote as it encumbaces an entire 16 person team… you even admitted this in your PMs to me… again you are contradicting yourself.
The winrate in my tests for russia were 80% and for USA/NATO it was 20%. Dont belive me? test it yourself and take notes.
Also the BMPT is broken… like objectively speaking its broken both in performance and literally broken in the case of its damage model. If you want a small example… The lower plate on the TT BMPT is thinner than the Premium one by 20mm but for some reason is more resistant to darts impacting it than the premium one. All other geometry of that plate the same (other than thickness)… I have nothing to say to you if you simply cant see the writing on the wall. This is my last response to you.
2 Likes
Fair and balanced
Heres some more evidence
1 Like
And that cannot be used to justify positions. Just as I’ve never used my experiences to justify positions.
You can use the BMPT yourself and find out what your KDR is in it, and use that disparity between other vehicles you use, but that’s about the only thing you can use to argue if something is OP or not from personal use case.
BMPT’s damage model uses the same identical standards of being created as all other vehicles, and citing it only makes USA look good.
Because to this day T26E5’s lower front plate is modeled incorrectly in its favor.
BMPT’s damage model matches its visual model while T26E5 does not.
None of my post is a defense of BMPT’s BR, it’s purely commenting on the stuff commented about.
Fair, and balanced
TT BMPT:
Premium BMPT-72:
Now lets test against M774, a round that often faces these vehicles…
TT BMPT:
Premium BMPT-72:
dont beleive me??? test it yourself
1 Like
ALL nonsense… I cant believe you’re real.
Saying youve never done something… when anyone in this thread can look at your history and see that you in fact do these things, along with contradict yourself constantly. I gotta stop responding to you… i am being ragebaited and its unfortunately working.
Very fair, and very balanced
Me: “BMPT should be at least 11.3 instead of 10.3 based on this cross analysis I’ve done.”
People falsely accuse me of things.
How so ?
It’s by far the best performing medium at it’s BR among major nations and even if you take into account all the minor nations and rare vehicles, it’s still the 7th best performing vehicle at 8.3 out of 37 in total.
It hovering around 40% WR while keeping such a high K/D and K/S just shows how broken it is at it’s current BR.
Yeah weve really hit a point were even the biggest defenders should concede that Gaijin will do absolutely anything to pamper russian winrates when theyre slightly threatened
This is the first time you have said this… notice how you arent able to actually quote this in the thread? Youve proven me right… completely fake quote. Also not pertinent to the discussion bc the BMPTs are already 11.3 and are still destroying teams.
Ragebait
1 Like
Yes, you’re right, but because many people panic when they see a BMPT, it can easily be destroyed by shots to the lower plate and the side, fired accurately by any MBT in 10.7. The problem is that the BMPT has the most ridiculous weak spots ever for disabling the vehicle, and one-shots are really hard to do ( Because there are few places where this happens )
It’s funny how your post claims it’s ragebait to say BMPT should/could be moved up.
Really? it can be easily destroyed by 10.7 MBTs?
this is my own testing… No idea how you can have this position.
1 Like
I’d love to balance purely through capabilities, trust me.
However US top tier would be hit equally hard as top tier Russia seeing as the IPM1, M1A1, M1A1 HC, M1A1 AIM and M1A2 are all undertiered capability wise. The only thing that keeps them at their current BR is poor statistics.
2 Likes
it can easily be destroyed by shots to the lower plate and the side
Uuuh no