BUK is very strong because you need to destroy all of it.
No other system has that level of redundancy. Skysabre has been refused it despite it being proven the launchers can function with the loss of the Radar system.
It really isn’t.
2 Likes
Its interception rates would say otherwise.
2nd best SAM in the game.
Have you played it or making educated guess?
Cause when it was first released it was garbage but nowadays it performs well for ARH system.
Japanese AA thinks different.
And after shooting Radar , BUK relyes eyes only and narrow scan of launcher. What is ironically better and faster compared to main dish.
Well you clearly stated that USSR is op in every category when it actually is not.
And little fun fact , on KD BMPT is number 2 and 72 version is number 10.
Biggest issue on BMPT’s is exessive spam of those.
You can’t really tell me it’s really strong while having stats like those.
Biggest issue is the damage model and lacking important features such as turret basket and ammunition not bein modeled as internally.
Fix its damage model add those features and it will become significantly less threatening.
2 Likes
So you never played it but relying on stats only?
Exactly.
I haven’t ever played a really strong vehicle that had such crappy global stats.
1 Like
Please, tell me how strong buk is… :D
And yes, I do have BUK in lineup, I still rather take free pantsir over it on most of maps, and most situations.
Buk is just horrible, maybe it would work if we would have something size of a 747 , like AC130 gunship…
1 Like
Kills is not how you judge a vehicle. The BMP-T at higher tiers does not kill as well as it did lower down.
But what it does do is cripple tanks, absorb huge ammounts of fire and draw focus.
You cannot easilly disable a well positioned BMP-T
1 Like
Yeah, I only took last month in that look, not all time or december when it was 10.3
It will take a few months to get an accurate data set.
You still see them at top tier they are very much playable and a still shred barrels easilly enough.
Both sky sabre and HQ-11 has better kill per death ratio than IRIS-T, does that mean those two systems is better than IRIS-T overall?
This just shows how people like you depending on stats can make such an absurd claims.
1 Like
Yeah man I’m pretty sure both sky Sabre and HQ11 are better than IRIS-T considering they have better results.
Next time do experience the vehicle first before making overall claim.
You’d have a point if those former two were vehicles from major nations, like SLM is.
And? BUK is also part of one of the biggest if not the biggest nation in this game.
Have you ever considered that BUK’s stats pulled down by many unexperienced players?
Well both of em are clearly better compared to BUK.
How do you keep rating BUK then, fear factor? Historical aspect? How well it performs is best how to look something.
And like I wrote, I do have BUK and most of times is just dusting on lineup , since it is so goddamn BAD.
Iris, Claws and nasam is what I personally got and I keep em all A lot more useable compared to buk, and those stats just proves my own feeling.
Yes I did but now compare BUK with SLM.
It’s really a no contest.
1 Like
shhh… Unexperienced players are know to have top AA, and are really bad at looking rotating radar screen and clicking target what to shoot…
Instead unexperienced players are most likely not cooking stats from free AA’s instead…