by your logic, the Jumbo is WASTELY overtier due to its cannon and should sit around 4.0.
by my logic, Jumbo has underpowered cannon, but the gets a good mobility, STAB and very much unpennable protection to the front. Which makes it pretty decent brawler at the rank. Same goes for the BMPT - it was undertiered at start due to pretty unpennable armor for 9.3-ish tanks, the cannon and ATGMs there were strong enough as arent THAT uptiered, and the mobilty was mid. Now it sits at 11.3 which is pretty decent considering its guns are overtiered vastly, but ATGMs being balanced, the mobility being bad and the armor being not unpennable.
There is no darkside when the enemy is a BMPT.
Finally find someone else playing the 2K D-R1, it’s great.
But it s harder to spawn with the EBRC since BMPT’s are everywhere and un-killable with F&F missiles
Us waiting for a dev to say “we have seen your messages, let us think about it”
We got to 6k replies here.
1 Like
Just because someone reached to top tier doesn’t mean they have enough experience to play properly, in this case your performance on top tier vehicles proves my point.
So what were you saying again?
Awwww, stat checking, fine.
Your performance on buk is just on line as in stat cards.
And happpens to be worst performing aa’s what you got on top tier.
Now, tell us how strong that buk is again? And how to play it properly instead.
Funny I was referring to your tank’s performance rather than AA since they require much more experience and knowledge which seems you lack quite a lot in that part :)
Funny that you cant answer the questiong what we were talking about.
And since tanks require so much experience ( true) why you dont perform in buk over average?
And why you keep defending and saying it is strong or nearly op , when it is not the case ?
And no I’ve never stated that I would be pro , I keep myself as average player and I play for fun. If it is even possible on wt.
( And yes I am one of those CAS whores on ground games.) I focus getting flying instead of my stats while playing top tier most of times)
Show me where I said its nearly op/op, I’m waiting.
According to my experience as an ARH platform it performs well.
I also prefer using CAS but that doesnt mean I’m gonna suck with my tanks.
Saying and keeping it on line things like IRIS, HQ, etc, and saying it is well performing, is NEARLY saying it is op. ( what iris actually is) It is more my own opinion about your defence on BUK,
But yeah, keep defending, and please let us all average players know what we are doing wrong since we are dropping KD of BUK on top tier. How can we get it scan faster , how can we keep better lock on targets , especially who can actually notch or use terrain as cover?
Even Aim 120 C7 is more consistent of hitting things compared to Buk… But yet again, what would I know least according to you.
Did I compare those vehicles with BUK or did I say it performs well according to my experience?
You need to enhance your comprehend skills buddy.
You do realize once missile is launched it can rely on its seeker against enemy air units right? That’s whole point of ARH seeker in order to not to rely on main radar.
That tactic also works against any ARH seeker based missiles, BUK is not special in this case.
If you can come up with actual questions and acceptable claims rather than empty accuses I can actually have conversation with you.
Well seems like it.
[quote=“Panther2995, post:6282, topic:292256, full:true”]
Have you played it or making educated guess?
Least you are agreeing on that it is strong in this one… But but but…
But something are absurd, like now you dont keep buk strong in your opinion ?
But yes, since you keep it so well performing, educate us, how to be better in it, when it is just pile of…
And which parts on my comment says that BUK has identical performance to IRIS-T?
Even in that screenshot there is nothing that comes close to your claim.
Again you need to enhance your comprehending skills.
What is this have to do with BUK?
This comment proves that despite having better stats both Sky Sabre and HQ11 is worse than IRIS-T in my eyes.
Seems like you’re quite butthurt that I don’t share your vision.
Anyway it seems there is nothing to discuss with you since you can’t comprehend my words properly.
I was wondering if the bmpt 72 still worth its prices at 11.3 and if i can add 2s38 with t80 ud to it?
@SilentTracker, do you think this counts as #57 or not? Don’t have it, but it would seem like BMPT is laughably OP rn
2 Likes
The BMPT-72 is higher BR than those two premiums. Better to just use the lower BR ones and not force yourself into permanent uptiers. The Tech Tree BMPT is better than the 72 anyway, even though it is also higher BR than the 2S38 and T-80UD.
If you really really want the BMPT-72, get the higher BR premium T-80
@RDXRooster63 I’d count it lol.
3 Likes
So it’s just better to use 2s38 and t80 ud for grinding?
Ok up to 57 lmao 🤣
I have an idea: for each threads number, I will find a vehicle with that number in the name
ZSU-57-2
1 Like
Tech tree BMPT is much better.
I would highly recommend those two over going with higher BR premiums. Those 2 make the start of a very good lineup. And while you will get up tiers to 11.3 or 11.7 once the 2S38 goes up to 10.7 BR soon, you won’t get up tiers into the 12.0+ range as you will with the BMPT-72.
Also the T72 TURMS-T can be added to that lineup, though the T-80UD is a much better choice first.
Then for SPAA’s, you can use both the Srela and 2S6. Again the 2S38 is going to be going up to 10.7 BR in ground realistic battles very shortly, so you can already start looking at other vehicles at 10.7 to use in your lineup for ground realistic if that is what you’re planning on