11.3 has made no difference. Ive had more BMPTs in 10.3 games than 11.3 games. They in 99% of my 10.3 games.
2 Likes
Bad players apparently
When they add the T-14 Armata, I’ll just quit the game forever. That’s it.
Glad I’m not the only one who’s noticed.
My question is why Multi-Crew Tank Combat 4 can add all the latest vehicles without such a commotion taking place.
What do they do different…
There are multiple TD/SPG’s in the game with scouting. Not many, but there are. At “top tier” BR’s, I do not think there are any.
For artillery I cannot name any others off the top of my head other than the BMPT’s.
They make the vehicles somewhat balance while trying to keep it as accurate as possible, i guess
MTC also has the BMPTs but the difference being that they blow up with a well placed shot since i think their RNG elements aren’t as bad as WT’s
Also they’ll either use IRL info or do their own calculations to determine a shell’s penetration, which tends to differ from WT, hence why in WT you’ll have the 2S38 APFSDS’s pen being 222mm when in MTC it’s like 170-ish or something
oh, and the devs are active in their discord, actually looking at bug reports and other issues that players posts there, which means an issue is usually fixed rather quickly depending on how serious it is
We already know how bug reports in WT can take months or even years to be fixed even if it’s been marked as accepted
MTC is obviously on a much smaller scale compared to WT tho, since they are pretty much ground exclusive with the the exception of helis
The thing is, the Russian Ministry of Defense loves to embellish its military achievements on paper. And if Gaijin adds the T-14 to the game, they’ll take the performance characteristics from those same documents. According to the documents, the T-14 Armata is completely indestructible. Its APS can even intercept APFSDS rounds. So I’ll just quit the game.
lmao armata still have the auto loader of the regular t-series plus you can just useless as the turret is not even protected.
not to forget its big as your ego against russia so you will spot it easy.
Well :
- Bradley A3 10.0 = APFSDS
- PUMA 10.3 = APFSDS
- PUMA VJTF 11.0 = APFSDS
- BMP-2M 10.3 = APFSDS
- Desert Warrior 10.0 = APFSDS
- Ajax 10.3 = APFSDS
The list goes on , so at 11.3 it’s crazy that BMPT has to fight with 3UBR8 especialy given 3UBR11 is not even penning that much , it has almost identical penetration to M919 which sits at 10.0 so yeah …
Maybe you should compare the winrate before saying that nonsense.
5 Likes
Or you know, the fact that all those tanks get turned inside out to pretty much all KE ammo in their bracket while the BMPT can absorb more damage than the T-90M without any issue
1 Like
You’re quoting the wrong person. You don’t need to tell me about the BMPT BS. It’s way beyond imaginable limits.
This vehicle continues to ruin matches. It still randomly takes hits to the sides (almost none) – it has five crew members… five Carl, hit -3 sides, two survived. I can’t understand at all how, when a tank’s barrel is hit, it loses the ability to fire. Why does the BMPT’s turret traverse mechanism and barrels remain functional even when hit under the turret barrel?
Do not reply to me again if you are going to ignore the rest of the statement. The only td that get scouting are vehicles on what most would call light tank/tankette chassis, or possibly some of the open box style td. The only examples that come to mind would be the ASU’s.
It’s even crazier that even without APFSDS, the BMPT is way more efficient at crippling tanks than most of those
“Do not reply to me again” if you are going to be rude, condescending, or dismissive. I was not rude, condescending or dismissive towards you. You just reacted with unwarranted attitude.
All of those tanks listed above have very low RoF APFSDS, just imagine the outrage if the Puma could fire its AP rounds at 600 RPM. Zenturion made a video about it, the difference is night and day. The BMPT APDS only works because of the high RPM.
well, besides the BMP-2M and the AJAX, tho the AJAX tends to die to a BMPT before i see any
That and the APDS isn’t even that bad pen wise, the APDS does allow you to pen some weakpoints even in the front, stuff like the Type 90 especially is really bad against it since it can pen like 3 different areas in the front, so it wouldn’t even need to disable the barrel and tracks depending on how quick they are
I think the desert warrior has a 25mm bushmaster with like 90mm pen APFSDS, slightly worse than that APDS but the fire-rate def makes a massive difference there, and i think it’s 10.0
Wonder how the hell they thought those 2 were only a 0.3 BR difference when it first got added