That’s not how SS works.
Oblivious to the fact T58 is a thing.
I don’t understand why it takes so long to fix a BR situation.BMPT should be at least 12.0.Currently,it is pulling every 10.3 10.7 matches to 11.3 because of sheer amount of BMPTs.Why the BMPT is at 11.3 which is at the exact BR as Namer while superior in every aspect.I don’t play ground anymore because of BMPT.It pulls me everytime to 11.3 while i play 10.7 US,Germany,UK
Are there any mods here that can give an explanation to the BMPT’s still having artillery?
1 Like
Better artillery than scouting.
Watch them give it scouting because it’s having a “hard time” getting nukes LOL! There are a handful of SPG’s with scouting already.
It already has artillery, so no.
Because monnnneeeeyyyy
To be fair, this happens equally to NATO tanks when shooting their breach from and angle, as you shot that T-90s from an angle, coupled with the fact that there’s a good chance the world object that was clipped when you shot messed with some values.
Just a thought
God forbid they add the T-15 Armata thats in Multicrew Tank Combat, nobody would be ready for that.
If the Merkavas chassis wasn’t ungodly classified it would have the equivalent protecction or greater of the BMPT
1 Like
So when you say “react differently”, I’m assuming you mean the only difference of this hull being maybe a power system, slightly different ammo layout and a turret swapped out for autocannons.
I’m not intending to be hostile, I just want to fully understand what you mean by this. Because from my understanding, if Gaijin were to per say, add the T-80/90 (basically a T-80 chassis with a T-90 turret, are people going to react the same way and claim “it reacts” differently? When it’s effectively the same chassis being ran throughout the majority of Russia tanks?
Remember when the T-90M was added and people said the same exact thing “it reacts differently”. Though the only real difference was spall liners and ammo being seated lower than the T-80.
That went on for weeks on end until people just suddenly remembered they are the exact same weakspots as the T-80BVM except that the turret had overall better armor.
I really don’t think the issue has anything to do with damage, the issue has to do with the nature of tank chassis being mounted with autocannons.
Think of it this way, what if the U.S made an HSTVL equivalent but with tank armor. I’m sure you can already imagine how that would go.
You can see in the first few seconds I have to be more precise where I aim in the HSTVL (with any Russian tank) just because of the Relikt.
1 Like
People still defending an overpowered vehicle the cycle of cope continues …
4 Likes
I’m just applying some logic instead of just saying “overpowered”
I’d be more than willing to hearing what you have to say if you’d explain yourself :)
I’ve said all i have to say in this thread already thx
Just remember people said the same exact thing about the T-90M when it first launched
And I sure don’t see anyone talking about that tank anymore and nothing about it has changed.
Standard cope cycle too
“RU tank is OP and under br’d again”
RU supporters "nah your tripping because (insert reason here) "
multiple and many people later - “no…we’re not”
RU people = “well skill issue RU poor, there was this (insert other vehicle here for deflection purposes) ”
3 Likes
UPDATE: JAPAN does NOT struggle with experienced players xD. Glass cannons with mobility have bee the best tanks hands down.
I’m convinced I can kill the BMPT with Chi-Ha LG
2 Likes
TD get neither :).(Disregarding the open top/ guided atgm only boxes) Ammo box with either is terrible too
Br changes are shown.2s38 is going up to 10.7
T72B3 is going down to 11.3
there is no bmpt change.
Who the fuck decided T72B3 at 11.3 is a good idea
They did act differently- the spall liners were corrected after release. People didn’t suddenly remember , bugs were fixed.
So youre implying the Terminators spall liners are bugged?
If not, whats “bugged”.