Okay… you’re not going to like these results.
Cause the results show that players playing BMP-2M are about as skilled as players playing the other IFVs in the Soviet tech tree.
In-fact, here are the stand-outs: BMD-4s. They seem to attract the higher skilled players.
The premiums have the higher skilled players than the tech tree one.
It’s s heavily armoured,but not on the top of its turret. The shockwave of its Atakas exploding comes from above said part of the tank,meaning the vehicle should die from overpressure regardless
Yep, it’s always funny when people pretend this only happens when they add strong and iconic Russian vehicles
If it was an American vehicle it would’ve been 9.7 and not 10.3
It’s pretty classic for USA vehicles to be under br’d
120S
T58
Hstvl
A few other I could come up with are very to this day over preforming and vehicles, meanwhile Russia is the only issue.
lol, 5/10 troll.
I can vouch for the T58 because it should be 9.0 minimum and not 8.3,but the HSTV-L and the 120S overperforming?the HSTV-L has a combined 0.88 KD and the 120S has a combined 1.10 KD. For crude comparison, the T-80UD has a combined 1.16 KD and the 2S38 has a combined 1.15 KD.
Meaning that if the HSTV-L and the 120S are overperforming at their BR,the T-80UD and the 2S38 are more busted
How is that a troll?
T14 is 4.7
KV-1 is 4.7
T14 is way better
T29 is 7.0
Is 3 is 7.3
T29 is better
T58 is 8.3
T-10M is 8.3
T58 is far better.
These are just the heavy tanks. Stop having baseless claims
The hstvl is often played wrong, and that is a player problem.
The 120S can be somewhat situational, but it’s 5.0 sec Ace reload + top tier pen at 10.0? 10.3? With an abrams turret is quite good. It lacks good mobility and hulk armor though, and that still doesn’t make it bad, in Bull Dow it’s a monster.
2S38 should be 10.7 as I’ve been sayin forever now, and is listed as 10.7 in my br change list.
T58, thankfully someone agrees the T58 should’ve been 9.0, as I said when the dev server was up for when it was coming out.
Not only is it premium, it’s available for everyone, and has out shined even the Obj. 279 in pretty much every capacity besides mobility.
I don’t think the HSTV-L is overperforming in the game balance sense, but then again I also don’t think the 2S38 is super problematic so maybe that is just a me thing.
I personally like my light tanks.
Hstvl I have found to be quite deadly against all but the the Leo2a7s, but yet again most tanks struggle vs those.
It doesn’t matter,if the combined KD is 0.88 it means the majority of players play it like it is supposed to and you can achieve 4 kills every 5 deaths.
The 120S has a good round and amazing thermals for 10.3,but that’s it. The 5.0s reload is only if it’s an aced crew, otherwise it’s 5.3s expert and 5.8s maxed which is still good,but not crazy good. The turret armour is still weak to 3BM42s at some ranges (since the M1A1 doesn’t have either a DU insert or a Steel insert) and the biggest Abrams weakspot is even bigger in the 120S. I played that tank and although it is good, it’s far from being overestimated
It’s just pure Russian soft power projection now.
Such is the fragility of Russias ego.
The two of you are crying in every thread about Russia bias, it’s actually impressive how much effort you put into this.
Every update does nothing to dispell it.
If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck it’s very much a duck
And the USA has the only stealth vehicles in the game.
Very potent experimental vehicles: hstvl, rdflt, t58, t29, etc etc.
Had plenty of updates where its planes set the terms and conditions of br ranges.
That’s just a list of your personal opinion.
I can compare them statistically if you’d like
You have a point with T58, but the others are a tad silly.
KV-1 Zis5 has more armor.
IS-3 is just pure armor.
M60 AMBT being 10.0 while TURMS-T is 10.3 is hilarious.
Both are lol-penned, but the vastly more mobile M60 fires a 3BM60 equivalent round while the other doesn’t.
HSTVL is fine where it currently is IMO. 2S38 could be 10.7 to match the increase HSTVL got.
0.86:1*
Even less for the tanks KDR.
@luque13 @ItsOnyy
I’ll keep playing tech trees superior to the Soviet tech tree regardless of your posts’ advertising for it.
I’ve played enough to know that USA, Germany, and China are more fun.
Sweden will likely be more fun as I enter 10.x again.
If you removed the APFSDS from the Namer, changed the missiles to 800mm pen SACLOS, and increased its front armor by 85%, you’d get a BMPT with better survivability, scouting, and a drone.
It’s hard to dispell something to someone who doesn’t want that thing to be dispelled.
At this point you are looking for things to confirm your pov, not to find out what is actually going on. Was going to type confirmation bias first, but not sure if what I just said fits the description of that term.
