Mmm, yes, calling Americans “you people” will certainly get people to have fond views of you… /s
As stated, all ten tech trees have had OP vehicles, and some still do.
BMPT is another bad implementation due to ignorance of how effective the armor would be in matches.
This situation is adequately explained on the basis of ignorance.
Stuff happens, it happened with EBR, PT-76-57, M3A3 sort of, Puma, and is currently happening in air on a number of platforms.
Being 70 - 80% better armored in the front aspect than Namer 30 is a rather notable increase in protection.
And because the ammo isn’t modeled correctly according to my allegations, turret shots on BMPTs are pointless until that issue is fixed.
Use HE if you want to shoot turret, and i think it’s armor being better than Namers is not the problem with BMPT being at 10.3, the problem is that Namer is overtiered as many minor nation vehicles for whatever reason just like that japanese SPAA (slightly better strela) that sits at 11.7 with no radar
The amount of times I’ve fragged T95 via cupola using Tiger 2s has exceeded 10, probably over 20. I lost count.
10.3 doesn’t see APHE anymore, so I’d say the BMPT is stronger for the BR.
actually you do see APHE because as it’s often the case now you get all vs all matches at that BR so technically you can count 2s38 in the enemy team with APHE
Well if we add some condition AGS or M1128 hull down is really difficult to deal with a lot of vehicles could be difficult to deal for downtiers like Ho-Ri production, Panthers, Tiger 2, German KV with 75, Excelsior, Churchill 7 etc.
So I have some time to play like 1-2 more games before I need to leave to work. This was the first game in my SEPv1 and SEPv2 after I logged back on (and yes, matched against Russia like you asked). Not the best game I have played, I’ll give you that, but still not a bad game overall.
EDIT: second game was a 7:0 K:D win, but the enemy team collapsed so quickly that most of those kills were around their spawn, so I’m not counting that one.
What are you talking about? The Abrams’s mobility is equal to or even worse than that of top-tier Soviet tanks and other MBTs. The T-90’s firepower is so powerful that it can destroy an Abrams practically anywhere. But to destroy a T-90M, the Abrams has to target vulnerable spots, which are very, very random.
How many times have I shot at the weak spot of a T-90 or T-80 and it simply didn’t do any damage? In fact, if you look closely, the T-90M and T-80BVM are the most armored MBTs in the game.
Holy cope. The majority of the T-series mobility isn’t even close to the mobility of the Abrams, only the BVM comes close to when it comes to the Abrams in forward mobility.
T-90M is a joke mobility wise.
T-series firepower is mediocre at best lol. Especially on the T-90M.
Here I highlighted a very important part:
YOU. It’s quite obvious at this point that your aim is at best mediocre.
Abrams mobility is superior to all Soviet tanks in War Thunder.
M1A2 SEP with TUSK is even marginally superior to the over-performing T-80BVM mobility:
30: 3
40: 6
50: 10
-38 reverse.
Traverse: 9
T-90M is worse than M1A2 SEP2 with the mine plate attached.
T-90’s firepower is equal to that of M60 AMBT.
T-90M’s weakspots are always the same spots: Breech, lower plate, and side armor on urban maps.
The T-80BVM isn’t even in the top 10 most armored tanks in the game.
T-80U is at least a bit more armored than BVM, and that’s 7 tanks right there.
And tanks more armored than T-90M: Strv 122 x3 firing equivalent rounds while being more mobile.
However, this is just a distraction from BMPT being OP.
BMPT’s T-72B like armor is causing issues because the turret ammo isn’t modeled correctly, and the turret is semi-recessed like Object 775.
