To be fair, the firepower is weak for 11.7, but it’s balanced out by it’s stupid levels of survivability.
5 Likes
11.3 with belt change so it fits 11.3 lineup. Either ammo just burns entirely like on namer or kills it.
2 Likes
thanks for proving my point.
Pick a 10.7-11.0 tank and go face that thing in arcade. You shoot the driver port, more often than not, the round is absorved by their magic era
3 Likes
Why don’t you mention the armor difference ?
It’s supposed to be outperformed by click baits
1 Like
Then you did not hit the Driver Port…but the ERA…
What BR do you think the bmpt should be at if it doesn’t get APFSDS? 10.3?
1 Like
11.3 is perfect.
Puma VJTF is 11.0 . Worse in every way, but not by a 0.3br, but more like a 1.0 br
3 Likes
Buff puma instead cause its garbage right now. Spike loft and heat jet direction fix would help it a lot.
1 Like
You know both can be trash at their respective BR? The PUMA VJTF is trash yeah…that doesn’t make the BMPT at 11.7 any better.
Can move the BMPTs to 11.3 and buff the Spikes for the PUMA (and everyone else who has them) cause they suck
1 Like
T90M chassis, ammo box, twin cannon, 8 fire on the move atgms, small gun hit box, 11.7 is fine. 11.3 premium I’m fine with that. But 11.7 tech tree bmpt
2 Likes
The T-90M / T-72 Chassis is the single only thing which is 11/12BR worthy…and comes with the same weakspots…
Firepower you literally get stronger at 10BR (BMP-2M for example)
Not to forget the Mobility is utter crap.
Top 10 most stupid things ever said in the WT forums ever.
6 Likes
You don’t even play at this BR.
In the immortal words of Dr Evil, “How about Nooooooo…!”
1 Like
No, it doesn’t use APFSDS irl and also shouldn’t get it in game.
(to anyone, read FIRST before you actually reply) Fix the armor issues and both can stay where they are more than perfectly, with the 72 version maybe going back to 11.3 WHEN FIXED, this ones armor is quite pathetic when comparing it to the techtree variant but as they are rn they should stay where they are with what they have for armament. Doesn’t need APFSDS whatsoever
2 Likes
Go down in br? To 11.3 where the Namers are? The same namers that loose all of their gun ammo when the belt gets hit but the BMPT doesn’t?
It should not be lower than 11.7
2 Likes
if this is not bait idk what to tell you man
1 Like
The BMPT cannot use APFSDS as its feed system is incompatible. Please stop suggesting it.
The BMP-2M should not have APFSDS either, as it shreds the barrel within a few rounds.
The 9M120 ATAKA has 800mm of penetration with a tandem warhead. It is well capable of overpressuring and penetrating nearly everything within its bracket if used correctly. In some cases, like with the Abrams (except for the new SEPv3), the ATAKA is capable of penetrating its entire hull frontally.
These are only a few examples. While even 12.7 MBTs have to be careful and aim with precision against the BMP-T, in turn, the BMP-T is only required to hit them in the barrel with its cannon or fire a missile at their lower or upper front plates. In some cases, it can cut through the entire front as well.
You don’t need better missiles.
Correlation and Causation are not the same thing. The low KD is caused by below-average players buying it in bulk because it’s overpowered and rushing with it. While this method works (which is what I do at 12.7), I am not a below-average player and know when to push someone and when not to.
Objectively speaking, the BMPT is more capable than every single minor nation MBT at the top tier, except for the Strv122 tanks.
Furthermore, the BMP-T’s model is egregious. Hull Ammoracks aren’t a guaranteed kill, and belt shots to its turret don’t detonate it either, except in a few rare instances. The belt of the BMP-T doesn’t even feed into its own gun on the model, unlike other autocannon vehicles.
BMP-T
Namer
CV90 MkIV
Freccia
Puma
Bradley
15 Likes