Take some HE/HEAT/HESH shells. They pop VERY easily. I have no issue popping BMD’s when I am using non light tanks.
If you are using APFSDS rounds, you are not going to kill them as easily. Too much empty space, even with all the new module additions. And/or not enough armor to cause good spalling compared to hitting an MBT.
Gotta make more coffee, this has turned into an enjoyable debate. Cheers guys, be back in a little bit.
Most BMDs i killed were unaware of my presence or somehow managed to non pen a death shot on me
If you play hide and seek type shii with the IFVs,meaning you flank hard,not spotted,get around enemies,shoot them all and bail and repeat
The BMDs is still too strong for that play style while the other IFVs at the same br bracket really cant do it for multiple reason
Either lack offensive armaments or lack mobility or in some cases (Bradleys) they lack both
WarThunder have a bunch of issues that could be easly fix…doubt however they will bump this death machine at 10.0 regardless,russian bias
Ah, in case you have not looked much into their “Visibility” stat, you should check that too. The Bradley’s is QUITE high for a light tank @ 117%. All the BMD’s/BMP’s are in the 70%-80% range. This is a HUGE negative for the Bradley’s, YES even in Realistic. Visibility/Keen Vision stats DO affect Realistic Battles, no matter what the naysayers claim.
If they would make Bradleys shoot ATGMs on the move (meaning higher speed than 5 km) it would have been good IFVs
it is
it had space for 3 ppl in the back
I have to agree with you on that. A lot of the non BMP/BMD IFV’s cannot fire on the move, which aggravates me to no end, and is definitely something that should be considered in terms of balancing the BR’s etc. OR just give a lot of those other vehicles the ability to shoot their ATGM’s on the move.
Not sure which other IFV’s can actually shoot on the move IRL, but definitely is something worth noting.
Only IFVs with Spike missiles can, TOW being wire guided is not realistic to shoot from the move, someone in another post about the TOWs linked a webpage talking about all the limitations of firing TOWs. I do have Freccia and KF41, even better than BMDs but I got bored of how good they are. I can kill almost any IFV with these two by simply popping them with a spike. KF41 especially is so good with the good autocannon and the active protection.
I know its not realistic but remember,when it comes to russia and top tier performance,it doesnt have to be realistic
Russians gets non existant missiles so it means they could make the Brandley shoot on the move ATGMs
Its either that or make the Bushmaster an actual threat
If you only tried it,you will honestly go insane
the Bushmaster struggles to pen stuff even from the sides which makes it the worse IFVs in the whole game
Yeah I tried it, I have USA top tier too. That’s why I don’t play the Bradley, it’s really bad. They should at least give the top attack TOW 2B the same penetration like the Swedish missile on the Strf 9040 BILL, which has an insane 510 mm pen against the 100mm of the TOW. I can’t even kill a T-90A on the firing range with that missile, does nothing after shooting 2 missiles. TOW 2B also has more explosive mass than the Strf 9040, so it makes no sense to have that 410 mm of pen difference between these two.
the missile on the BILL has a different warhead than the TOW iirc
yeah but 410 mm difference is a bit much. Maybe give the Bradley a better TOW missile if there better modern models.
There is no better TOW variant
We all know russian bias,thx you
that missile looks very existant to me, dosent it?
Still not removed vehicles btw
Vehicles that never made it even by a wood mockup
Planes that had a wood mock up but without being actual jets,got removed too for some reason
You have documentation to prove it?
No cause last time i check,when it comes to russia,Gaijin shove stuff without documentation
But when it comes to buff US for example in 1 thing,they need to proven by 240k people with 498k pages of documentation
By your point,i could go on photoshop,put some non existant stuff on an American tank and tell Gaijin
“Hey look,theres a photo,must be real”
Yuh uh
Russian overperforms for the most part
If they dont get top tier shit every single update they aint happy
Why you needed BUK for example when other nations still struggles to deal with cas
Why does Gaijin have to nerf US to the ground for no actual reason when all they do its just exist?
Russian bias,change my mind in another topic tho
Making the Bushmaster actually usable doesnt take much really…
All they have to do its just put some effort buffing USA
But since its Gaijin,i highly doubt that
