This impacts T-90M’s externally mounted ammo as well.
TL;DR: Just bring APFSDS if you’re worried.
If you bring 9 rounds of proxy fuse ammo, you’re fine.
I am actively looking for source material that proves HE rounds utilize blow out panels, but so far I haven’t found anything concrete.
A lot of documents that potentially imply that though.
The second post of this thread
On the video, around 6:20, is that the second ammo storage (the one with on in the hull)?
some, not all…
I think it’s because this dart penetrated the side that’s facing the crew compartment.
That’s also where the fireball from the replay started.
I highly doubt Gaijin would make a “yeah blowout pannels don’t work when reloading” mechanic. 2015 Gaijin maybe, 2025 Gaijin nah they don’t even bother to make Turm III correct. I also remember losing all ammo in my Leclerc halfway during a reload.
I find it crazy how they will continue to push this Lie.
Continuing the discussion from Blowout panels:
Contrary to what the US gov says.
Leopard 2’s test drive was relevant to my bug report.
That post being copy-pasted is appreciated.
They also aren’t lying, they’re being honest with the information they think they have.
I think that information is wrong, but I cannot fully prove it.
You can’t think you have information. You have it or you don’t. They manufactured its limitation and they should explain it as so and not as some false fact.
While you might appreciate it I do not and it further gets in the way bug reports that may be similar but have different information.
