Bigger map = Bigger rewards for destroying people

Game Discussion General Discussion
1

Hi, i think that if bigger the map, the bigger should be rewards for destroying enemies, since maps are bigger and finding enemies is much harder than on smaller maps

3 Likes
2

Which br? Like 9.0 onwards any vehicles with gen 2 thermals makes it very easy to spot targets. There is one cocaine map called volokopoop or something, can sit 50m from spawn and watch 70% of the map kill enemies as far as 3km. Feels like it’s cheating especially with vehicles like PUMA with 15x gunner sight zoom.

3

I suppose it would make sense for 6.7-8.7 where some 3x3 km map exist yet the tanks are mainly slow.

2 Likes
4

This probably relates more to Air as there can be some “big” maps like Afghanistan where finding players can be a bit tiresome (more of an EC match/Sim issue though).

1 Like
5

Gaijin has already effectively solved this by making larger maps incredibly uncommon.

6

By allowing people to ban or dislike them?

7

Oh no I just meant by virtually removing them from the rotation. Can’t have people driving for more than a few seconds before pewpew, player retention would suffer.

But you’re right there too, given how tiny the handful of reasonably sized maps there are.

1 Like
8

I wonder why I did that… maybe because of number of dislikes and bans?

Play SB then

9

That’s like 3 vehicles. If that
Well it’s more but mainly TDS or events 🤷‍♀️

10

Maybe Combined Arms Enduring Confrontation here is something you’d be interested in.

11

enjoy your Call of Duty tanks edition, how incredibly immersive lol

there’s virtually zero instances in which you can have a semi realistic tank duel in warthunder, small urban maps are utterly cancer and totally break immersion because it’s literally not designed for such and it also is against doctrine.

you know what happened irl? tanks are quickly picked off unless they have strong infantry support.

they don’t even bother adding more battle rankings for you guys anymore lol

12

Lmao, trying to talk about realism in PvP game.

13

You can’t say that, the low attention span players will hound you. Maps are even being flattened because people don’t have the IQ to understand hull-down tactics and corridors are being added to prevent flanking because people want nothing else but head on rush B comrade interactions.

1 Like
14

These days I rarely spawn in maps like advance to the rhine or abandoned factory, these maps are just brain dead bro I don’t even know people like these type of maps because of how often it drop I assumed it’s due to likes

1 Like
15

Truly, God forbid you try to play smart instead of follow the lemming train you see every match that consists of 90% of players moving in column down the middle of the map.

16

Agreed, some of the maps I just leave immediately if I get them because there aren’t enough bans to go around.
Sun city or sweden are almost always an instant leave for me.

17

worst thing about banning maps is this that warthunder is allowing to banning some of gamemodes on maps, not actual maps, so you could don’t like some maps but still need to play it because it’s in other game mode

1 Like
18

Yeah this is true, some of the maps I don’t mind but then they will have a one cap version of it which is absolutely awful and you can’t selectively ban the worst versions.

1 Like