+1
make it so that helis that can carry soldiers IRL can cap points faster or if infantry gets added allow them to spawn on helis
2 Likes
Hopefully we get this soon ingame.
+1, however Japan should NOT get a copy paste Osprey.
Why shouldn’t Japan get it? They already have 13 and are apparently ordering another 3?
3 Likes
Copy paste is bad. Besides, America doesn’t deserve for the only vehicle, unique to America, to have been added in months be extraordinarily garbage (the F-117).
I may just be biased against copy paste in saying this, but I think the nations in WT should be unique (why even have nations if they all have the same vehicles?)
1 Like
Because players want to use their countries vehicles, and even in WW2 vehicles were sold as exports to other countries so there will always be duplication and there always has been. Ignoring that precident is abit odd.
And the F-117 works very well. However the reward in sl and rp does not work effectively for it’s small payload.
1 Like
This would be insane +1!!!
1 Like
Copy paste is bad. Why even have separate nations if they all have the same vehicles?
The F-117 is overtiered and pretty broken. The fact that it’s higher than the A-4E whilst being objectively worse is wild.
It’s 8.7 in air rb how is that overtiered? And considering vehicles of it’s era can’t radar slave missiles to you from a long distance away is quite useful. Theres always the threat of IR missiles.
And most of us would disagree. Because what does a nation do when it runs out of homebuilt vehicles, and other nations still kept making more advanced ones? Do you want germany to stop after the Me-262 and Horten 229 ingame?
Giving the V-22 to Japan (if applicable) would be a nice addition to the JASDF tree for v/stol vehicles.
4 Likes
It’s 10.0 in GRB (the mode it matters in)
It would be better that Japan doesn’t get copy paste, especially American copy paste.
1 Like
someone who doesnt play japan wants things to not come to japan.
japan operates mv-22’s and should get them in their tech tree too.
3 Likes
Copy paste is bad, Japan shouldn’t get special treatment.
countries that operate specific vehicles are in general allowed to get them
if you dont like it then you can continue crying about it but this is how war thunder operates and you cant change it
2 Likes
but do they have rocket pods and the turrets? they probably wont add them to japan since afaik they never put the rockets on them and i dont think they even got the turrets
A vehicle exported to Japan and operated by Japan shouldn’t go to the Japanese tech tree? Can’t really complain about most American vehicles not being exclusive to the US when they are commonly exported to most of the world??
1 Like
Except they likely don’t have any armament (especially the turret), so yeah, they probably shouldn’t get it.
US is also the only user of the AGM-176, and even they only tested it aboard the MV-22, so Japan definitely shouldn’t get that.
1 Like
We get it, you don’t like sharing your American vehicles, but fortunately the United States likes to share it’s equipment.
just wait until 5th generation fighters come along and everyone gets the F-35.
Also +1! For the Osprey for the U.S. and Japan.
Also would it be an issue if the U.S. one got the presidential skin, I love the way it looks. Probably would be some issues there though.
The thing is, whether or not Japan has the turret is questionable, let alone the US tested rocket pods
That’s a good argument. But if it’s “technically possible” then I suppose it would be alright.