Dude screw you, just play nintendo if you want exclusivity that much.
1989? As long as this…contraption crashes & blows up in a frequently spectacular & satisfyingly entertaining way in the game, then yes please put it in and don’t skimp on the effects
No, since it should stop at the Hs 132, Ta 183, Me 263, Ju 287, He 343 or on the date of May 23, 1945
japan more than likely didnt even have the rocket pods equipped. Also unsure if the GAU-17 was even bought for Japanese Ospreys. so they would be unarmed and pointless
I really don’t care if they have weapons or not. it existing alone would be very funny and I want to see a video of someone stealing caps with osprey for the entire duration of the match.
ok then they can just use the US osprey?
1 Like
I dont have US tree air that high to warrant such funny vehicle. hate their air tree anyway.
its going to be in heli tree probably. And you are basically saying that bc you just dont want to play US the Osprey should be given to Japan for no good reason
1 Like
oh yeah it’s technically a helo with vertical flight and props. well, not gonna play it then.
1 Like
This will be relevant if Gaijin introduces infantry. Infantry landing, say, on a point. That would be really cool.
1 Like
Huh? Who cares about exclusivity? I just want the individual nations to be unique.
rear .50 M2HB lol
Well, now, history would tend to disagree with you, and they give stuff to nations if they used them, so unique TT’s are kinda out the window. I see your point, but that’s just how it is, not much anyone can do to change it.
1 Like
We can make change going forward.
History doesn’t work that way. All nations have used aircraft bought as exports from others or copied eachothers designs entirely.
the US despite inventing the airplane used either french or British aircraft during ww2, so exactly
And this is a video game. not real life.
But we and everyone else play this Digital Combat Simulator (yes that is the type of game this is, just like DCS and Microsoft Flight Sims) because of the realism and as closely related to real life physics simulation that is possible within the framework the developers have.
And those veteran players like myself have been following and playing this game since 2013 and before because of the fact it keeps striving for realism in a free/affordable manner compared to dcs and fligjt sim, whilst also being more accessable to those with disabilities.
And there’s many, many realistic features that are with held because they would ruin gameplay, e.g random breakdowns or barrels colliding.
Adding copy paste vehicles is one of those things which should be with held unless necesary.
However it was deemed necessary for what you call copy and paste aircraft many many years ago.
Even in WW2, Nations share aircraft bought as imports. The gaps between br’s and tiers between nations would be far too vast. And some of those issues started to creep in, so when import aircraft could be added like they were irl, they were then added to the trees.
There is nothing wrong with import vehicles in nations.
the Japanese Ospreys never had rockets or even the GAU-17 though afaik, ive said it before, they really cant come regardless
1 Like