Begleit is the most toxic vehicle in the game. it need 10.0 or 10.7
1 Like
Ok give it APFSDS and TOW2A then
2 Likes
ZA-35, Falcon, BMP-2M, 2S38, ItpSv 90, Raketenautomat, USH 405, WZ305, ZU-57-2, PT-76-57 and more are all more toxic than the begleit. It’s no issue at its current BR.
1 Like
I disagree, your saying that South African and British vehicles are too good and should be moved up.
I use both when I’m bored and just want to go on unimpeeded rampages. Although it saddens me, both should be moved up by a step or two.
No! these are some of the only borderline OP vehicles Britain has.
It should be more effective at longer ranges but i find it to wiggle too much so i just use it as i said before.
Solid AP shell is more annoying than a same caliber apfsds that can pen leo 2 from the front, nice one
Oh it’s not even in the top 5 🤣
bagleits br is good the problem is that 2s38 is underbrd and most other no missile only autocannon ifvs are overbrd like cv9030fin which is no where near bagleit in terms of strenght
1 Like
okay sure the begleit first should get its apfsds
1 Like
I mean, yeah, it has a APHE shell with more pen than the begliet if they want more spall. Also, the begliet’s shell velocity is piss poor, aiming it is a nightmare sometimes (950 m/s on begliet AP vs 15000m/s on 2s38 apfsds)
Yh man the 2s38 have 15km for seconds of shell LOL ahahaha
Why? If he receives the apds mean that receive laser warning and IRST so at least i should be moved up to 11.3
oh and a infinite first stage ammo with i think 148 shells? meanwhile the begliet first stage ammo is 48 clips and reloads pretty slow. 2s38 can literally hold down the trigger continuously without any consequence
2 Likes
You spam topics/posts, You cannot accept the disadvantage of the United States in the game, promote its strength, belittle Russia to gain greater advantages in the game, HSTV’s anti air peers are all~9.0, prime it’s M247. And 2S38 has a huge ammunition quantity and unlimited loading and third-generation thermal imaging advantages, but stays at 10.0
HSTV’s anti air capability is 8.0 at best. Compared to M247, it lacks radar and ammunition quantity, and the disadvantage of ammunition quantity is not as good as 2S38. Therefore, ground combat should be lower than 2S38,
2 Likes
You have no ability to put yourself in others’ shoes and are self contradictory. While saying that others are praising America’s shortcomings and that American things should be worse than Russia’s, you also emphasize that things like HSTV are better than 2S38. It’s really speechless
1 Like
Which is true, mobility is worth so much more than a slightly better reload. The 2S38 is more comparable to some 10.X IFVs. I doubt anyone who thinks that it is worse has actually played both, or done a genuine comparison between the two.
Just like the 2S38.
3 Likes
@Angelsmile
I’ll keep my empathy close, and keep taking into account the perspectives of thousands of players.
I’ll keep being consistent.
I’ll keep arguing against artificially buffing vehicles, namely Soviet vehicles. [Artificial nerfs are something I also oppose generally.]
It’s interesting your post argues that 2S38 and HSTVL’s anti-air are 8.0 at best, neither of which are anti-air platforms.
Anti-air capability does not impact ground combat capabilities.
2S38’s anti-air ammo capacity is not relevant to ground combat capabilities. Many players only bring 16 rounds of ammo into matches, 26 is more than enough for a ground vehicle to take on other ground vehicles. My 2S38 and Begleit have ~40 rounds of AP, the rest being empty or proxy fuse munition.
Oh and 2S38 was brought up to 10.3 as I wished for.
And yes, I’ll keep defending American vehicles from Russian propaganda and similar arguments.
Prove to the entire planet that 2S38 goes 83kph, accelerates faster than all but VT1-2, has a 76mm gun firing a 1kg round penning at least 270mm… but those features would only make it on-par with HSTVL, not superior.
I just returned what he gave me intact. The point is that the weight of 2S38 is too low. As I said before, the mobility of HSTV requires experience to use. There are risks, compared with 2S38 ammunition, firepower and thermal imaging advantages. Above 1.7 is obviously unreasonable, and Russia is too strong in the game, which is obvious.
1 Like