America should have a whole range of tanks at 6BR to face the Panther and Tiger head on. So much of it is 6.3 or 6.7. I can never understand why.T20 and Pershing should be 6.BR.
1 Like
Having dooble, but having to use ten times more → seems like we have 5 times less in reality.
the F-15 isn’t that good, and is fine at 12.3, F-16C does everything the F-15 does, and more. 4 sparrows that never track anything and 4 IR missiles (F-15) or 6 IR missiles that will always track (F-16C)?
as for the MIG-29G, it has the best radar missiles in the game, which are already vastly overperforming. if you know the IRL stars of the R-27, you’ll know that of the 9% hit ratio, it never actually got a confirmed kill, and it was barely capable of mach 2, not once has it ever been capable of mach 6 (hypersonic speeds). not to mention it has R-73’s, which do the same thing as the 9M, with double the G load.
1 Like
You took what you wanted to take, most feedback is ignored, i read most of the 1000 comments and especially the top ones that were most liked, you ignored most feedback.
6 Likes
You don’t but aight I guess.
Because everyone has T80UK.not every one has T80UM2
That poor AMX-13 (FL11) still getting that raise… :(
3 Likes
See this 1st
You dont have to remove T-80UM if you just want 11.0 T-80U, you can suggest T-80UD, or wait till I suggest T-80A which is like T-80U but no thermals and no K-5.
I have and it still makes zero sense as shinji stated. Also ignoring the part about the large caliber flares being removed from the 29 before the 29 9.12a was even in game.
That doesn’t make any sense. Why would you remove thermals from T-80U (which it historicaly had) and move it to the BR in which there is no lineup for? Not a single benefit in that.
If you can’t understand it,… it’s not my problem,… but the game is set as the MiG-29 will spend less flares/chaffs per missiles to decoy them.
Yes! And the type 81 doesn’t have radar in 11.0 what the hell
1 Like
You have zero idea what you’re even on about but keep on i guess.
Agreed. Gaijin has messed up the lineups for 2.7, 3.7, 4.3, 5.3, 7.3, and now 7.7 France.
I think the constant BR changes are good, but they need to be smarter with them, and actually do tests with more feedbacl.
As I said before, whats the point of all this feedback if you ignore half of it. I highly doubt whatever algorithm Gaijin is using is as good at balance as the players who actually play the game.
6 Likes
its a different kind of playstyle usage, in a fight you can activate periodic release of the counteremasure in an ECM style attempt and prevent the missle locking on you in the first place, while larger ones can disturb it after it was shoot better. Thats more preference, but fact is that compared to Mig29SMT as example it has a lot less countermeasures.
And the M2k /M4k have the benefit of the A2G armament which the Mig29G is lacking. Mig 29G will be the only non Multirolefighter at 12.7
good amount of CMs and yeah it has the sparrows but it still has a lot of missiles and has one of the best flight models in the game they only downside is no HMD it definitely should be 12.7 along side the su27
That’s not entirely what I said, I mean that the current situation doesn’t allow Gaijin to properly assess it’s performance it the current meta, off coure best case scenario is the actually decompress the BRs (not this half assed BS they’re doing) and everyone is happy. I also played the F-8E for months before I got the F-5E (and before the last round of sales) and never saw any F-5’s outperforming the team. If the F-5E proves to be a menace to air RB in its curent state it should certainly go up.
what about Italy?
the KF41 at 10.7, its spikes perform much worse than the ones on the Freccia at 10.3, has only 2, and is slower. shouldn’t it be at 10.3 as well?
and the Otomatic. Very bad performance, no AA missiles and is in 11.3, should be dropped to 11.0 or even 10.7?
5 Likes
Why does the 2S25M get a double buff?
It’s already a very good light at 10.0
8 Likes