Yo garbage ass still sitting in the back or edges of the map with the stryker? or you still sitting in simulator shooting down planes? mr 1 death leaver
1 Like
The Japanese F-15 is heavier and less maneuverable for a slight advantage in IR missiles ingame.
the japanese f15 stll turns the same.
oh no the AAM3 pulls slightly more the horror
2 Likes
“Oh we changed the terrible BR changes a bit”, wanna feedback? Too bad! Instantly implemented!
It’s almost as if it has “(post feedback)” in the title. They already gave us a chance to feedback, how many iterations do you want lol
1 Like
Vallina M1 and M1KVT should get M833 shell, 377 pen shell is no match for MBTs in 10.3 BR. It’s fair to trade 1s reload time for 20mm(compare to 120mm DM23), but not 50mm
Just move it back down to 8.0 and leave as is. It wasn’t vehicle that I saw used much by many players, so I’m not sure how it ended being selected for uptier.
1 Like
Its British and was semi-good in niche situations.
No more reasons required
2 Likes
Well then fix it and move it up, simple as.
Don’t project your own insecurities about your gameplay and skill on me bro. Just because you to do that (without any succes) doesn’t mean I do.
And I haven’t really touched the M1128 recently, only sometimes as 4th spawn to try and kill a last few spawncampers before losing. Been mostly playing the SEPv2, SEPv1 and ADATS with decent success. Honestly good tanks now that I don’t have to deal with all the click-baits.
1 Like
merkava series reload must decrease to 6 or 7 sec per round
The reload was already buffed to 6 seconds ace for all Mk.3 and Mk.4 Merkavas though?
Went live a few days ago.
Can gaijin consider lowering the HSTVL? Why is 2s38 at 10.0? What advantage does the HSTVL have over the 2s38 to account for the HIGHER BR?
7 Likes
my insecurities lmfao? you literally have 1100 battles in 1 vehicle. That proves you don’t push or help. you get carried. Your second best vehicle in ground RB, is the ADATs, which unsurprisingly is also your best vehicle in simulator. " you sit in the back while your team carries you.
And yet you fail to counter a single one of his points whatsoever. Your ad hominems show that you don’t have any ground to stand on. If you did, you wouldn’t be resorting to grasping for ad hominems.
yeah this i agree on, but they haven’t done that, and they continue to ignore the other vehicles with these same problems
Really wish it was 5 like the Abrams lmao
More projecting. I push up more than enough. And you are the one who is a liability to their team because of your low skill. You can’t get more kills than you die which means you are likely out of the game quickly.
Also you admitted a while ago that all you do is sit in the back. Hell you even posted a video to proof it.
The fact that this also shows truely how bad you are. You camp in the back hull down and still have a negative K/D in all your abramses.
Finally not silenced on the forum, so now I can respond to this.
What is more absurd is the fact that you put words into my mouth and distorted what I’ve actually said in order to win an online argument about a video game.
I not once said that the T20 should be or deserved 6.3. Never, not a single time.
My entire argument has been two things:
- The T20 isn’t as bad at 6.3 as people make it out to be;
- The T25 isn’t better than the T20.
In fact, days before you even wrote that massive strawman falacy, someone asked me on Discord if i thought the T20 deserved 6.3, and my immediate answer was no, repeating what I’ve already stated.
Discord texts
Would I prefer if it were 6.0? Obviously, I have the tank. I am the person that made the bug report that got the transmission of the T20 buffed recently in the first place.
It also took me quite literally a year to find sources necessary for making that bug report, so I don’t want to hear any of that bull on how I hate the tank.
And it isn’t, the Pershings are all 6.7.
For armament you are ignoring the fact the T20 has a stabilizer, faster reload, faster turret traverse, and the almighty .50 cal.
You are correct about the armor, I won’t argue there, but that’s not how mobility works.
Pure top speed alone doesn’t determine how mobile a tank is. The M4A3 (76) is far more mobile than the M4A2 (76) despite having a lower top speed, because the A3 has much better acceleration.
And the T20 has even better acceleration than the M4A3 (76), while also having a much higher top speed, specially in reverse.
On a flat, good road, it takes 10 seconds for the T20 to reach 40 km/h, and 16 seconds for the Panther A, at least with my testing.
So not only does it have much higher acceleration, it also has a much higher top speed. Together, that means the T20 will be on average traveling at a much higher speed no matter the map.
Forwards mobility isn’t as simple as just comparing top speeds. There are other considerations like how quickly the vehicle gets up to speed.
Which is why Thunderskill (which doesn’t account for all matches even) says that the T20 was played in over 6000 matches in the past month before it was uptiered?
And the reason why isn’t because highly skilled players like to play tanks that suck. It’s because highly skilled players can turn the stabilizer and mobility of the T20 into a disgusting advantage.
And I am not part of that group of people. Even still, when the T20’s transmission got buffed (again, because of my bug report), I played it exclusively at 6.3 for a couple games and it still performed okay while being an extremely fun tank due to high degree of mobility it has for a medium tank and the stabilizer.
1 Like