Well，we kenw the poor win rate and bad combat efficiency of M1A2SEP，and we same konw the M1A2 SEP ’ s GPS uses the magnification of Daylight Sight at 3x-10x. But M1A2SEP has improved Thermal Imaging Sight，they TIS have optical magnification at 3x, 6x, and 13x along with digital enhancement at 25x and 50x. So maybe we can change the mirror magnification of M1A2SEP to 3x-13x to enhance its long-range combat capability.How do you think?
1 Like
Please learn the difference.
You =/= everybody.
Fact, that we did not implemented ALL suggested changes (often mutually exclusive) doesn’t mean we ignored feedback.
Just read the initial post with info of all the changes we have implemented.
6 Likes
P2W moment
1 Like
F-15A (USAF), F-15A Baz (IAF/UDF) and F-15J (JASDF) from 80’s never equipped helmet mounted display
I guess might be F-15C Baz Meshupar (1999) with IR SRAAM AIM-9L/Python 3/Python 4 and MRAAM SARH AIM-7M & ARH AIM-120B, and equipped DASH III
There’s possibility that F-15C (USAF) (2006 ~ 2011) & F-15J MSIP (JASDF) (2009) would get a helmet mounted sight and Joint Helmet-Mounted Cueing System (JHMCS)
USAF F-5E stay to 10.7 it’s balanced. But I might hope F-5E from ROCAF received AIM-9P-4 in first major update and decompress to 11.0 BR
Why cancel the F-5E changes, Its the best jet in that br bracket by far and just stomps any other jet it runs into
5 Likes
My France prem line-up is still getting shafted.
Fine then, Gaijin. Have it your way. I just won’t even bother trying to grind it.
1 Like
All F15 should be moved to 12.7 as well, please no more br compresssion
5 Likes
Could we get at least one time per year a br change with community suggestion with multiple iterations? To make things easier limiting the suggestions per user to only 2 or 3 changes would be a great solution
will you be adding stock aphe, stabilizer and heatfs to char 25t to make it on par with object 906?
2 Likes
F-15A never had HMD does it?
Only F-15C and E were provided with HMD/S systems
from all i see, none were ever used on F-15A (even the VTAS used on F-4J/F-4S USN aircrafts, and thought for both F-15A/F-14,… but the 2 last got denied before VTAS even reached a cockpit)
Hi
Would it be possible to get a comment as to why isn’t 2S38 being moved up?
Sorry for bothering
2 Likes
wait yeah Char 25t will be same BR as the 906 now 💀
4 Likes
Arleady made on Russian forum, but not here. Fun.
It’s completely different from a Panther, and should be played differently as such.
1 Like
So… 10.0 light tank gets 3BM60, but AGS at 11.0 now is stuck with practically useless M833 fighting LEO2A7 etc…
I see no problems with this. /s.
9 Likes
why are aircrafts such as A6M2 (1940 early war aircrafts) still set to fight P-51D-20/-30 (late/post war models?)
the BR’s currently are set by the results, yet, there is some incredible overlook of the ability of players.
Most USA/Russian players are very inexperienced,… this is not true for everyone else - why trying to keep a BR balance model flawed like this?
if you can ask/have an explannation over “how” you calculte BR - it would be great to see if we can add some new parameters.
Every BR changes we implement are “touched” by players feedback. We always open feedback thread and after we gather feedback, devs adjust changes.
1 Like
Thanks for considering our feedback, the list has certainly improved.
Even then there are still decisions that don’t make sense to me, and some glaring omissions.
Firstly, the 2S38 is way too strong for it’s current BR. It is equal and in some cases superior to HSTV-L both in terms of performance and most importantly it’s overall combat utility. You would expect the BR to reflect that. The 2S38 should be going up to meet HSTV-L at 11.3, or both meet each other halfway at 10.7 or 11.0.
Also, the Chinese M60A3 TTS is still inferior to the US counterpart at the same BR, changing the order of researchable modifications doesn’t change the performance in any way. My suggestion is to either give the Chinese vehicle M774 and researchable ERA module, or lower BR to 8.7.
You were on to something with the F-5E, it should be going to 11.0.
The F-5C is also ridiculously strong at 10.3, either it should go up to 10.7, or have it’s performance nerfed in some way.
T20 has no place at 6.3, even with APCR which is a sidegrade at best. The T20 should stay at 6.0, and the M26 reverted back to 6.3.
10 Likes
Alright, so if the falcon is going up to 8.3 (AA, no radar) then can we assume that every other nations AA around the rank, is going up? take the ZSU-37-2 first, 37MM with Radar, or the M-163 which has radar…
2 Likes
i would prefer bumping A-10’s A-6’s and Su-25’s than F-5’s,…
2 Likes