Better remove them from game, without flales they cannot find their place in balance
1 Like
Gaijin pls how the otomatic still is at 11.3 for the love of god, it’s terrible at this BR, 2s38 is at 10.0!!!
12 Likes
It absolutely isn’t “decidedly worse” than the T25. It’s far more mobile and with the added stabilizer and faster reload I would much rather play the T20 at any BR compared to the T25.
Both KwK 40 variants (L/43 and L/48) are worse in every way except reload, which is identical. The L/48 gets closer due to it’s longer barrel, but still fires a slower projectile, with less penetration, and with less damage.
The armor on Pz.IVs is poor, even on the Pz.IV H with add-on track armor because the majority of the turret is still just 50 + 15 mm effective. The mobility of the Pz.IV H is also not that great because it’s the heaviest Pz.IV. Overall the M4A1 (76) absolutely has better armor (due to turret, hull is similarly effective on both tanks), better mobility, and far better firepower as not only is the 76 mm better, even if only slightly, it also has a .50 cal and a stabilizer.
It’s a great gun but the M36B2 is more a sidegrade to the M36 than anything. It makes a massive sacrifice in mobility in order to have HEAT. Both could and probably should be 5.7.
17 pounder has great penetration but nowhere near the same amount of damage since it is solid AP.
Since you compared the Fireflies to the M4A3 (76) you should also mention how they have poor gun depression (only -5°) and nowhere near the same amount of mobility, on top of slower reload (keep in mind they only have 5 ready rounds). Also I certainly hope you aren’t including the Comet in there with the 77 mm gun.
The M4A1 FL10 seems like a great vehicle, but the M4A4 SA50 has a much longer reload, 9.75 to 7.5 seconds depending on crew, and has much worse mobility, due to the 4 ton higher weight.
The ARL-44 only has good armor specifically on the upper glacis, everywhere else is mediocre at best, the mobility is also mediocre, and the reload is 10 to 13 seconds, which isn’t exactly “decent fast-firing”.
Firepower is undoubtedly worse. Similar penetration values, similar damage, but the SU-100 has a 40% longer reload than the Jagdpanther. A Jagdpanther with a completely stock loader will reload faster than an SU-100 with a completely maxed out loader (9.75 seconds compared to 10.52 seconds).
The armor also isn’t “slightly lower”. The SU-100 upper glacis gets penetrated by something like the US 90 mm with M82, and the lower glacis is unchanged from the T-34, still 45 mm at 60°, and while the Jagdpanther’s lower glacis isn’t anything phenomenal (currently 55 mm at 55°), it does have the transmission behind it.
8 Likes
Still missing Me 410 B-1/U4 and B-26C changes because 100% identical in game planes Me 410 A-1/U4 and B-26B are moving. Also normal Pe-3 change missing i think not sure why early would be higher br than normal one that has quite more ammo for 12.7. and A6M5 Ko moving up but A6M5 with bit less ammo isn’t moving. Copy paste issue for Mirage 2K and P-51 was fixed.
1 Like
Please give t20 smoke shells. I don’t know why they shouldn’t be added. I’d rather smoke shells than apcr.
3 Likes
That would be great but even better, just give them flares and put them to 10.0.
Even though they did not have flares IRL, just give them flares anyway.
The F-5C never had flares IRL but look what it has in game.
There is no reason for the F-104’s to stay at 9.3 in their current state. I would rather a couple of planes be completely unplayable rather than an entire BR bracket be ruined by them.
Well，we kenw the poor win rate and bad combat efficiency of M1A2SEP，and we same konw the M1A2 SEP ’ s GPS uses the magnification of Daylight Sight at 3x-10x. But M1A2SEP has improved Thermal Imaging Sight，they TIS have optical magnification at 3x, 6x, and 13x along with digital enhancement at 25x and 50x. So maybe we can change the mirror magnification of M1A2SEP to 3x-13x to enhance its long-range combat capability.How do you think?
1 Like
Please learn the difference.
You =/= everybody.
Fact, that we did not implemented ALL suggested changes (often mutually exclusive) doesn’t mean we ignored feedback.
Just read the initial post with info of all the changes we have implemented.
6 Likes
P2W moment
1 Like
F-15A (USAF), F-15A Baz (IAF/UDF) and F-15J (JASDF) from 80’s never equipped helmet mounted display
I guess might be F-15C Baz Meshupar (1999) with IR SRAAM AIM-9L/Python 3/Python 4 and MRAAM SARH AIM-7M & ARH AIM-120B, and equipped DASH III
There’s possibility that F-15C (USAF) (2006 ~ 2011) & F-15J MSIP (JASDF) (2009) would get a helmet mounted sight and Joint Helmet-Mounted Cueing System (JHMCS)
USAF F-5E stay to 10.7 it’s balanced. But I might hope F-5E from ROCAF received AIM-9P-4 in first major update and decompress to 11.0 BR
Why cancel the F-5E changes, Its the best jet in that br bracket by far and just stomps any other jet it runs into
5 Likes
My France prem line-up is still getting shafted.
Fine then, Gaijin. Have it your way. I just won’t even bother trying to grind it.
1 Like
All F15 should be moved to 12.7 as well, please no more br compresssion
5 Likes
Could we get at least one time per year a br change with community suggestion with multiple iterations? To make things easier limiting the suggestions per user to only 2 or 3 changes would be a great solution
will you be adding stock aphe, stabilizer and heatfs to char 25t to make it on par with object 906?
2 Likes
F-15A never had HMD does it?
Only F-15C and E were provided with HMD/S systems
from all i see, none were ever used on F-15A (even the VTAS used on F-4J/F-4S USN aircrafts, and thought for both F-15A/F-14,… but the 2 last got denied before VTAS even reached a cockpit)
Hi
Would it be possible to get a comment as to why isn’t 2S38 being moved up?
Sorry for bothering
2 Likes
wait yeah Char 25t will be same BR as the 906 now 💀
4 Likes
Arleady made on Russian forum, but not here. Fun.
It’s completely different from a Panther, and should be played differently as such.
1 Like