IS-3 is fine at 7.3 it’d be awful at 7.7 because of the match making
4 Likes
Repeat again
69IIG 9.0 → 8.7
Which contrasts with the T55AM series, which is used for better protection and mobility, and 69IIG has better ammunition.
M60TTS (CN) 9.0 → 8.7
Weakened version has no reason to be in the same BR as the original version. Unless the Chinese M60TTS obtains the M774 and the same ERA as the US, it should be lowered to 8.7.
PLZ-83 6.3 → 6.0
Compared to other grenade launchers, PLZ-83 is not strong anywhere, and on the contrary, PLZ-83 lacks high equivalent HE.
12 Likes
Where is M900 for AGS? Or you really think M833 (which worse than 105 mm DM33) on 11.0 it’s enough to fight against top tier mbt?
And stop killing japanese planes. J6K1 on 6.7? Really?
AMX-50 (TO90/930) and Char 25t: 200mm pen on 8.0, no stab, no armor , and no hope for normal balance…
28 Likes
Why the T95 was removed from the changes, specially when his copula weakspot was removed and is not effective anymore???
The rate of fire for M48 plataform is good but the real problem is the crap perform of his HEATFS. Looks like buff western postpen ammunitons for Gaijin is taboo.
1 Like
4 second autoloader, but only has 200mm of pen, it really dont make sense its going to be 8.0
8 Likes
Good job! Thanks!
3 Likes
Seems like you made a fine job of ignoring everybody.
22 Likes
Sagittario 2 STILL going to 9.3?
Please leave it where it is, its going to be outright useless at 9.3 facing 10.3 missile spam.
J29D still going to 8.3?
7.3 planes do NOT need to fight an afterburning plane with great top speed and retention that they stand no chance against.
J6K1 Still going to 6.7 is just sad. The plane will be outperformed by 90% of everything it faces.
Now it will also face 7.7 jets which it simply has NO way of fighting.
This is a perfect example of a plane with mid performance at its current BR being raised simply due to being carried by its guns.
F-5E being left at 10.7 is actually insane. This plane has been over-performing at 10.7 for ages now.
The good change that was to move it to 11.0 has now been removed and the plane stays over-performing.
And I cannot state this enough… F-15 staying at 12.3?
Please tell me this is a joke.
The F-15 being one of the most powerful top tier 4th Gen fighters in the game and you are leaving it at 12.3. Even the Mig-29 SMT and G are going to 12.7 and yet the F-15 which is objectively better than BOTH of those planes still sits at 12.3.
Please move ALL the F-15’s to 12.7 with the rest of the top tier planes and do not leave it at 12.3, this plane SHOULD be 12.7 along with the rest of the top tiers.
F104A (All of them) 9.3 to 9.7 or 10.0. Please get this supersonic plane out of 8.3 matches, it is so unfair to fight its actually not funny anymore. You cannot catch it in any plane around its BR and it out accelerates, out-climbs, out-runs and out-powers 99% of everything it faces.
Su-25 and Su25k please move from 10.0 to 10.3.
9.0 planes do not need to face all aspect 30G missiles that they cannot avoid.
A10A and A10A late, please move them both to 10.3 and 10.7 respectively.
Flareless 9.0 planes do not need to face these all aspect missile carriers.
21 Likes
Thanks!
Please consider looking into the strela’s missile rather than buffing its br. The missile is far too overpowered and unrealistically effective given the small size of its FOV. Russia could use a missile spaa at that br, so nerfing the missile to realistic standards would make more sense and give the Strela more purpose for lower lineups.
3 Likes
Better remove them from game, without flales they cannot find their place in balance
1 Like
Gaijin pls how the otomatic still is at 11.3 for the love of god, it’s terrible at this BR, 2s38 is at 10.0!!!
12 Likes
It absolutely isn’t “decidedly worse” than the T25. It’s far more mobile and with the added stabilizer and faster reload I would much rather play the T20 at any BR compared to the T25.
Both KwK 40 variants (L/43 and L/48) are worse in every way except reload, which is identical. The L/48 gets closer due to it’s longer barrel, but still fires a slower projectile, with less penetration, and with less damage.
The armor on Pz.IVs is poor, even on the Pz.IV H with add-on track armor because the majority of the turret is still just 50 + 15 mm effective. The mobility of the Pz.IV H is also not that great because it’s the heaviest Pz.IV. Overall the M4A1 (76) absolutely has better armor (due to turret, hull is similarly effective on both tanks), better mobility, and far better firepower as not only is the 76 mm better, even if only slightly, it also has a .50 cal and a stabilizer.
It’s a great gun but the M36B2 is more a sidegrade to the M36 than anything. It makes a massive sacrifice in mobility in order to have HEAT. Both could and probably should be 5.7.
17 pounder has great penetration but nowhere near the same amount of damage since it is solid AP.
Since you compared the Fireflies to the M4A3 (76) you should also mention how they have poor gun depression (only -5°) and nowhere near the same amount of mobility, on top of slower reload (keep in mind they only have 5 ready rounds). Also I certainly hope you aren’t including the Comet in there with the 77 mm gun.
The M4A1 FL10 seems like a great vehicle, but the M4A4 SA50 has a much longer reload, 9.75 to 7.5 seconds depending on crew, and has much worse mobility, due to the 4 ton higher weight.
The ARL-44 only has good armor specifically on the upper glacis, everywhere else is mediocre at best, the mobility is also mediocre, and the reload is 10 to 13 seconds, which isn’t exactly “decent fast-firing”.
Firepower is undoubtedly worse. Similar penetration values, similar damage, but the SU-100 has a 40% longer reload than the Jagdpanther. A Jagdpanther with a completely stock loader will reload faster than an SU-100 with a completely maxed out loader (9.75 seconds compared to 10.52 seconds).
The armor also isn’t “slightly lower”. The SU-100 upper glacis gets penetrated by something like the US 90 mm with M82, and the lower glacis is unchanged from the T-34, still 45 mm at 60°, and while the Jagdpanther’s lower glacis isn’t anything phenomenal (currently 55 mm at 55°), it does have the transmission behind it.
8 Likes
Still missing Me 410 B-1/U4 and B-26C changes because 100% identical in game planes Me 410 A-1/U4 and B-26B are moving. Also normal Pe-3 change missing i think not sure why early would be higher br than normal one that has quite more ammo for 12.7. and A6M5 Ko moving up but A6M5 with bit less ammo isn’t moving. Copy paste issue for Mirage 2K and P-51 was fixed.
1 Like
Please give t20 smoke shells. I don’t know why they shouldn’t be added. I’d rather smoke shells than apcr.
3 Likes
That would be great but even better, just give them flares and put them to 10.0.
Even though they did not have flares IRL, just give them flares anyway.
The F-5C never had flares IRL but look what it has in game.
There is no reason for the F-104’s to stay at 9.3 in their current state. I would rather a couple of planes be completely unplayable rather than an entire BR bracket be ruined by them.
Well，we kenw the poor win rate and bad combat efficiency of M1A2SEP，and we same konw the M1A2 SEP ’ s GPS uses the magnification of Daylight Sight at 3x-10x. But M1A2SEP has improved Thermal Imaging Sight，they TIS have optical magnification at 3x, 6x, and 13x along with digital enhancement at 25x and 50x. So maybe we can change the mirror magnification of M1A2SEP to 3x-13x to enhance its long-range combat capability.How do you think?
1 Like
Please learn the difference.
You =/= everybody.
Fact, that we did not implemented ALL suggested changes (often mutually exclusive) doesn’t mean we ignored feedback.
Just read the initial post with info of all the changes we have implemented.
6 Likes
P2W moment
1 Like
F-15A (USAF), F-15A Baz (IAF/UDF) and F-15J (JASDF) from 80’s never equipped helmet mounted display
I guess might be F-15C Baz Meshupar (1999) with IR SRAAM AIM-9L/Python 3/Python 4 and MRAAM SARH AIM-7M & ARH AIM-120B, and equipped DASH III
There’s possibility that F-15C (USAF) (2006 ~ 2011) & F-15J MSIP (JASDF) (2009) would get a helmet mounted sight and Joint Helmet-Mounted Cueing System (JHMCS)
USAF F-5E stay to 10.7 it’s balanced. But I might hope F-5E from ROCAF received AIM-9P-4 in first major update and decompress to 11.0 BR