what about giving the bmd4 it’s atgm back (non-tandem) with unlimited capacity and yeeting it at 10.0?
Oh and I forgot to add something:
Why is the T-28 1938 going to 1.7? The old T-28 is already at 1.7 and has a better gun. Keep it at 1.3 where it belongs.
And that is still a bad idea regardless. Honestly we should just do what capncruncher said and purposefully drag down the efficiency rating to prove a point. Even if the devs miss the point, at least the vehicle gets fixed.
Char-25t in 8.0, very big joke. Next change of Br, it will go to 9.0
And why is the French AML-90 in 7.7 while the Israeli is in 7.0?
WHY is the AGS getting uptiered to 11.0 getting the M833 only barely justifies it getting uptiered to 10.7, with the current situation 90% of the vehicles that the AGS is going to fight has at least 200mm penetration difference. The AGS at 10.3 is already perfect. if you want to make it 11.0 atleast give it a 400mil pen shell
No please do, an ULTRA rare MBT, not a light tank. which was the reward for an event almost 4 years ago.
I think if i’ve seen two in battle, in all that time, it would not be far from the truth.
But sure uptier it, but i care more about a vehicle which is readily available, then some rare event vehicle.
I am tired of pointing out in these topics for months and sometimes years certain BR disparities for absolutely identical planes which are still not resolved, especially for arcade battles (does anyone remember they exist?). There is no reason that two identical vehicles don’t have the same BR in two different nations in this game mode:
- French F-100D and chinese F-100A BR 9.7 → 9.3 : like the american one which is better in every way.
- American, italian and french F-84F BR 9.0 → 8.7 : like the israeli and german ones which are identical.Terrible flight performance for a 9.0 aircraft.
And this BR changes brings a new inconsistency in realistic battles : the french B-26C is now BR 4.7 and the american B-26B BR 4.3. Exact same aircrafts once again…
And I probably didn’t mention all of them sadly… Could you please report these persistant issues to the devs ?
GG, they just updated the Br changes. RIP Japan
I can’t wait for you to revert the French changes when you realize how gimped you just made some of them.
God some of these BR changes are retarded. Most of the French vehicles around 7.0-8.0 lack HEAT and APFSDS where their national counterparts generally all have them.
They won’t.
They give a **** about minor countries(especially French and Britian)
What they are doing is to make these vehicles unplayable to satisfy premium noobs .
indeed - so some vehicles are not played any longer causes that they have no more statistic data → no change forever in their BR…
AGS at 11.0 is probably the worst thing this BR change or the A6M5 Ko going up AGAIN is probably worse. But the AGS has G1 thermals and the worst gun and ammo at 11.0 now ain’t no reason not to give it M900 now that its at 11.0
the STOCK grind in that thing is pure PAIN even tho is an M60 in 10.0
AGS players slaughtered too many T72AVs and leos.
After new batch of 11.3 premium tanks come out in future Gaijin will add M900 and throw it’s to 12.0
AGS
Regardels of the round it has only medicre optics with Gen 1 thermals which is big shotcoming in top tier, where a lot a vehicles has Gen 3 and would be able to detect AGS way sooner then ather way around, AGS would struggle.
They say, you can’t kill what you can’t see…
Type 81c
I find Interesting that this vehicle without radar, without Thermal sight, on a truck chassis, sits even higher thet the 2S6 with radar, Gen3 sights, decent overload missiles, 2(4)x30mm guns and tracked chasiss.
Please give the ags m900 as the m833 round sucks above 10.0, putting the ags at 11.0 and only giving it m833 sucks, it had m900 irl so why dont give it that instead
T34 is okay at 6.7.
What’s wrong with the m1 kvt?
Me: Not sure the T20 needs to move up
Gaijin: Its gets an ACPR round
Me:…yippee?
Stella moving up was clutch. It was needed 👍