Roland is nerfed to a stupid flying cigarette,Starstreak is totally broken,radar of ASRAD is nerfed to shit
AND
2S6 get a 32G missile and sit still
Strela is only 10.0 while other SPAA in 10.3 are all nerfed/unplayable
1 Like
It does make sense though, not having an 11.0 downier means 11.3 doesn’t have to face 12.7, they can’t fit 2 brackets between 11.3 and 12.7.
They’d have to do 11.3-11.7 - 12.0-12.7 or 11.3-12.0 - 12.3-12.7 IMO these brackets are too narrow
We are not having 11.0 downtier for similar reason why 11.7 couldn’t have it when 12.3 was Max, once 13.0 arrives we’ll probably see 11.0 downtier again as I’m predicting we’ll see 11.3-12.0 by then (based on how it’s changed before)
Trust me, I love 11.0 in sim, check my stats and you’ll see. By far my most flown BR.
M4A1 (FL10) → PCOT-51P
EBR 1954 → PCOT-51P
AMX-50 (TO90/930) → HEAT-FS (The same as the M47 Patton)
Char 25t → HEAT-FS
Arcade :
M26 → 6.3
Object 906 → 8.3
11 Likes
something that would be missing for a next BR change is to move the Su17M2, Su22m3, Su22umk3 to 10.0.
In the br in which they are is to be constantly playing uptier without counting that investigate them completely is a challenge having even some null countermeasure capability or directly not possessing it as is the case of Su17M2.
They’d be really op at 10.0, I could see 10.3. Only one that could go the 10.0 would be su17m2. Um3k has countermeasures and is faster than most things at 10.3 even.
I can tell you why, USA is the most played nation so is the one which most players spend more money on it, so they’re vehicles always need to be in a good place, is like what they did with the t34 in the us tech tree.
They raised all the heavy ones of those BRs (is6, is3, Caernarvon, etc.) but they never raised the t34 to 7.0, because the “community” or rather the us mains complained, it is also the same reason why they do not raise the f15 , not even the Japanese with their aam-3.
It’s funny since the “community” complains that this game has a pro-russia bias, but I would say that the bias is for someone else. Sincerely (strela 9.0 to 9.3, now they were going to raise it to 9.7 but it is not enough according to the “community” now to 10.0, of course, the bias is in russia brother…
1 Like
in that br at least there are things that can deal with them facially the problem would be when it touches 9.7
Some of the french 7.7 still go to 8.0 and are just dead to most people. Also extremely not needed since the TO-55 is at 8.0 with a stabilizer, apds and heat.
The Japanese A6m5 ko and the J6K1 going up when it’s just people that ground pound and turn fight because they have no clue how to play the game. While the P51h stays at 6.3 with having superior performance. The f5e and the f15 again why aren’t them going up in BR? USA has the most underBRd planes in the game. It’s crazy how bad the pilots are compared with their planes.
The AGS goes to 11.0 and will die there having equivalent firepower to 9.3 vehicles, and don’t start with flanking. Gaijin is slowly killing flanking on most maps. And even from the side you will not go through T-80s because of reasons.
And don’t know what else to say. Only that it’s a complete lack of understanding of their own game and/or not caring enough to actually make the required changes.
5 Likes
U guys should consider the Challenger 1 MK3 DS situation make it 10.3 and ad the L26 round to make it decent because that tank is lacking A LOT in the br that it is and the oponents that see
1 Like
The APCR is useless but the T20 won’t be. I’ve played it near exclusively at 6.3 and it performed just fine.
Gaijin these are some great changes and I commemorate you on taking the feedback to heart, but why is the falcon still being moved up? It doesn’t belong at 8.3 along with the likes of the marksman and the za-35, its slower, doesn’t have radar and would deprive GB of any AA between the 5.3-8.3 range. The falcon is needed as an spaa for Britain’s 8.0 lineup. This thing should not be able to face against things such as the SU-7B or the f-100’s, its just not good enough at this BR range. If it performs too well as a tank destroyer then you should just remove the sabot and keep it at 8.0, because having to use the bosvark or skink at 8.0 is just ridiculous. And even if it is very good as a tank destroyer there is no way it should be .3 BR higher than the WZ305 which has HE-VT and APCBC at 8.0, which allows it to be better both as anti air and a tank destroyer.
1 Like
LMAO,Strela has BEST IRCCM in game,20G missile and unhistorical 6km range and you want it be same BR with SIDAM ?
rUZzIan sUfFeR
What about the AMD.35 (Sa 35) moving down?
Advantages against the TT version:
- Turret slightly more angled
- HE access
Disadvantages against the TT version:
- Bigger silhouette
- Less Ammo
- Less Penetration
- No coax MG
2 Likes
Why is the J6K1 going up in BR? The only way for this thing to fight jets is the head on them. You literally don’t have the wing rip speed and high performance capabilities like a P-51H and Spitfire MK24. I don’t know how you can justify this.
2 Likes
And the J7D is the omst over tierd in the MiG 21 family. Its essentially a MiG21MF with slightly better missiles, no CM pod, and no SARH missiles.
4 Likes
Yes for the naval :,l
F5Es still need to go up. Also where are the F-15s??
2 Likes
THIS IS BRITIAN
Use skink in 8.0
Use ZA-35 in 11.3
1 Like
I would like all Gaijin employies who take part in the balancing, to exclusively play, 9.7 subsonic jets Vs the F-5E, The Mirage F-1 vs the F-15, The Saggitario II vs the Ariete etc… And then go ahead with these balances
Seriously tho, I’m so tired of this, half the jets in game are unflyable because of BR compression, The F-15 NEEDS TO GO UP, and anyone who says otherwise should play the Mirage F1, J37D, F-104S vs it and then say it’s bad and has to stay
1 Like
F4U-4 is still fine at 4.7, no point to decrease its BR
Gaijin really thinks F4U-4 is equivalent as A6M3 mod. 22?
mod.22 doesn’t even have Type 99 Model 2. really?