BAe Sea Harrier - Technical data and discussion

runs so deep even the guys who built the harrier are in on it

1 Like

Nope, you did your own. you added a number he didn’t say.

being what number then hmm

20k lbs

I don’t know, you tell me, i don’t know where you got that from because no one has said that other number. You assumed that the other vector would be the same size, no one has said this.

If one is .5 what is the other then

.866
Basic first thing in trig. they are not linear.

around .85

image

take a maths/physics class please @MatrixRupture

ok so then what would the standard force be for this engine

20k lbs

It is still a vector and it dosent become longer

image

Doesn’t matter for the thing i’m trying to discuss with you. It can be whatever you want for the sake of discussion. But if we are looking at the image you have been showing then it’s 20k total for every angle.

28,000 * sqrt(3)/2

Tell me anyways

I believe we all know that basic trigonometric functions don’t apply to the Harrier for it is above such mortal human invented constraints. In fact, the entire mathematical field of study should be reformed to adhere to the likes of the Harrier, not the other way around.

4 Likes

In all honesty i don’t know what you are asking. What do you mean by “standard force”?

The images you have shown shows 20k lb of force.

image

his engine would not be making the same in order for 14,000 to be 50% and an unknown amount to be the other .866

its not unknown
it is 14,000 * sqrt(3)

and its not as he said he was using 28,000 lbf

24,248.7