He messed up at that point. But you really do have problems with vectors, their understanding and how to add them.
Go watch his little youtube channel on your ipad broski.
He gave the total thrust output as 28,000 and then said that 14,000 of that was going horizontally backwards.
meaning half of all the TOTAL thrust would be going backwards even though the nozzles are pointing more down then up
Jesus, its still ongoing xD
Funny who flagged it…
At the time this was writing it was topic as 2 dudes were discussing something for litarall Days because “Cos 60”
which is the case at an angle of 60°
I don’t really just mind numbed from this entourage of feet pics fans trying to justify his error
This is correct, the vertical would then be 24,248. which is bigger than 14,000, but 14,000 is still half of 28,000.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
so then you have to think that a nozzle pointing more down then backwards is imparting an equal force both ways for this to be correct in the context of the harrier
nobody said that
Literally, thats even better than Enhance Viggen :P
what he concurred is that you dont understand vectors
If you say so at least I understand that pointing the nozzles forward on a harrier does not result in equal acceleration up and forwards.
and again you are the only one who is implying that
Everyone here understands that, no one has claimed otherwise. You are reading what we are saying wrong.
No one is even talking about his mistake. You all arguing about math here instead of discussing the Harrier.
I do not care in the slightest the out come of the vector
I only care about the Acceleration added horizontally and longitudinally
He stated that half of the entire 28,000 pounds would be pushing the plane forwards even though the nozzles were pointing more downwards resulting in the aircraft accelerating equally up and forwards.
Gonna crack the 4k messages with this single argument, pretty sure its 1k messages long now