BAe Sea Harrier - Technical data and discussion

Wrong.

Which is correct
82a6441ddea1619ce63268e2f00e213075799828

No you are just trolling

gives you the wrong value mate

Not even a little.

The vertical component doesn’t become the “leftover 50%” because there ISN’T a leftover 50% , you can’t calculate it like that.

The total ISN’T a simple 1+1.

Edit:
Hold for a minute, i’ll show the math

20000/2 is 10000 which is the value of the thrust for 60º, 20000·sqrt(3)/2= 17300 which is the value for the lift, and sqrt(10000^2+17300^2)= 20000 which is the “groos trust vector”
image

he said the remaining 50% is giving it horizontal thrust

genuinely you are trolling at this point. IG you two are friends.

resultant length: 20,000

Creating two vectors where one is 60 degrees from the resultant.

Component a = cos(60 deg)*20,000=10,000

Component b = sin(60 deg)*20,000=17,320

a + b = 27,320 (which is NOT the length of the initial vector)

See how the horizontal and vertical vectors DOESN’T total to the length of the initial vector?

So the horizontal component being half of the initial vector DOES NOT mean that the vertical component is also half. Something he HASN’T said anywhere.

Lol what?

From this point (bold), in my opinion, the discussion went off in the wrong direction. The guy just threw away half of the engine’s power and kept the wing loading unchanged. So where did the vertical component of thrust go?

image

he said it was and he made the assumption that at 60 degrees of nozzle angle half of the power was going down and the other half was pushing it forward.

Literally just look at the source the power is split evenly forward and downwards if the nozzles are at 45 degrees.

Where did he say this?

The screenshots you have shown he does not say this.

split evenly is not the same as half of the initial. they are very different things when working with vectors.

It pushes the plane up

horizontal he said was 50

He does not say split equal, he says half of the initial. Two VERY different things.

This is literally what the chart shows. Why is it 10,000lbs at 60 degrees in the chart?

That’s exactly what I’m talking about, and it’s completely missing from FeetPics calculations.

yes it is

COS(45 degrees) = .707

so are you telling me a 45 degree nozzle position has a 70 % offset in 1 direction? (of the aircrafts vertical and horizontal planes)

image_2026-04-19_222911617
.707*28,000= 19,796 lbs force 1 way

and 8,204 in the other

at 45 degrees of nozzle angle

sure…

A 45 degree offset produces a thrust vector 0.707 timers that of the total thrust.

the horizontal will be 70% of the total and the vertical will also be 70% of the total.

It’s quite literally the reason that bridges look like this:
image

1 Like