Tank any instantaneous turn rate the harrier can pull with the wing alone and then add 1-1.5 G to it to get the ITR.
This is also just for 95.5% RPM
Seeing as jet velocity and power affects the surface of the harriers wing using normal lift thrust will increase this addition of G even more. In addition to the simple fact that more gross thrust is being directed downwards.
I don’t think you understand the math. You actually need to compare F-4E at maximum takeoff weight, calculate the inverse logarithmic function, and then compare that to the Harrier STR multiplied by a factor of 1.27x because British numbers are different than American numbers.
13 is actually bigger than 14. But only in the British Aisles and on Tuesdays.
Would be helpful if there wasn’t a troll misconstruing data to make the harrier appear much worse then it is.
IE taking a harrier at 75% - 80% internal fuel and comparing it to a starfighter with just 50% fuel
For example a harrier at 50% fuel weights only 15,500 lbs the one he used was at 17,200. You know only about 1 ton in weight difference compared to comparative fuel quantities. (A harrier with 2 x 1000 lbs bombs slapped on the wings vs the star fighter and the harrier still has some advantages pretty cool right)
He also continues to misinterpret VIFF data and sustained turn values.
