Version for the AIM-9G type missiles was LAU-7/A-1 to A-3. Launchers introduced for AIM-9L were LAU-7/A-4 and later
Visibly the A-4 modifications for the 9L only differ significantly in terms of the design of the fin retainer assembly. Instead of one clip that fit the 9D/G/H fins, the A-4 had a dual clip: one to fit 9G fins and one to fit 9L fins.
LAU-7 models used in game are generally dual-clip types regardless of the period of the aircraft (inc. F-4 Phantom, Harriers GR.3, AV-8A, F-8 Crusader etc. etc.).
Both Sea Harrier FRS.1s share the same mesh file with the single LAU-7 as part of the base aircraft model and only differ in terms of how they’re encoded in the game.
i.e. they will still have the same single LAU-7 launcher regardless of if the retainer design is adjusted.
If thats our “top tier” jet for the year, I’d be quite upset. Another bomber would suck. DOnt get me wrong, it would be fun to have, but totally unneeded considering we have some of the best CAS jets in the game already. What is needed ASAP is something, anything, actually competitive at top tier in A2A
I seriously doubt it at this point. We’ve got 3 new vehicles already confirmed coming this update. That 50% more than we got last major udpate and more than we usually get.
Maybe they’ll do something similar to how they did the Harriers or a10s by making and late and early varient if they’re adding the sea harrier fa2 this update