BAe Harrier II (UK versions) - Technical data and discussion

he is an aboslute skin wizzard when it comes to harriers

3 Likes

image
i dont know if its worth anything but our HUD has a NSN XD

image

1 Like

Well… R.I.P. Harrier GR.7 in ASB. 9M useless without recognition on radarless plane, and BOL now its… meh… So GJ just killed that plane. For God’s sake, i started to believe what GJ its hatred to British tech tree

1 Like

They need to remove 9M and drop it back to 11.7 in SB and 11.3 in RB. There is just no need for it to have 9Ms and be so high. Harrier Gr9A with the better engine and HMD can come at 12.0 with 9Ms again.

He’s already at 11.7 in ASB, isn’t he?
image

GJ need to fix RWR GR.7. It’s ridiculous. Plane from mid 90s can’t determine the source of radiation and distinguishes only PD or non-PD radiation

1 Like

That is correct;

Spoiler

Spoiler

image

Spoiler

Spoiler

2 Likes

Only since last BR changes, was 11.0

Wait do you have a Harrier II flight manual?

Got two, early and late service versions.

5 Likes

idk if i didnt see it but what radar bands can the RWR pick up?

The ingame bands are correct.

at least something but what are they? i dont have it in my head and my game not open, sorry not sorry for being lazy. XD

nvm

image
Well in case anyone else wanted to know.

2 Likes

o7

Is there evidence Gr7 ever equipped TIALD 500? I can’t find a source for it? O

Other than

Which isn’t clear

image
Harrier might see a better BR

1 Like

Unfortunately 9Ms. I doubt it. If it has 9Ls yeah, could have gone down to like 11.0-11.3

I would like to see the M’s when they add the Gr.9A. then there would be a reason to have the Gr.9A

The manual covers the use of TIALD 400 and 500, either can be used.

4 Likes