BAe Harrier II (UK versions) - Technical data and discussion

it’s just the front cover

hey matrix

4 Likes

Matrix says hi (He’s been banned for a week)

2 Likes

Matrix that traitor. Disowned :P

why was he banned lol

Posted a page from the AV-8B manual which is still classified.

Well… it was going to happen eventually

It would be best going forward if the discussion here returned to the Harrier.

2 Likes

He could’ve just used this manual that also has em diagrams that is actual available for use

Spoiler

image

2 Likes

wait it was him? oh boy…

1 Like

Yes, he loves that yanky thing too much

1 Like

image

7 Likes

I wonder when they’ll get around to the Harrier?

9 Likes

Are you Flogger as in Bob Dickensons’ friend?

is there a primary source on harrier engines like this?
su-39 engine.zip (9.5 MB)

Spoiler


image

Flame is already on the case

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/jPnIHzJGkCvF

5 Likes

hopefully we’ll see it when the br ratings change drop

Probably, I’ll go looking for one. Though since I can’t speak Russian I don’t know exactly what anything means to draw a comparison.

As an aside I don’t exactly know why the Su-25’s are getting preferential treatment here, many reports have been rejected in the past due Gaijin relying solely on the instrument cluster to determine running temperatures, not actual documentation for whatever reason.

Though for harrier 1’s the Engine is limited as follows;

Though considering max continuous thrust is only at 525 degrees it is pretty cold.

engine temps =/= Ir signature. Matrix already tried that before and it didnt work

Nice so now IR sigs are no longer attached to engine thrust or whatever that excuse was for the Harrier’s being hotter than the sun.

Hoping we see them actually fix it for the Harrier’s now.

1 Like