They nerf all of the UKs historically good vehicals.
Typhoon, Harrier, CVRT, Chieftain, ect…
Hunter is in high BR we dont get the Gant or the hawk for smaller BRs the CR3 crap csn be kiiled by a 15cal harriers are abysmal in air rb even the rapier came broken ste stormer still doesnt have the martlet and ++++++
1 Like
Gr.3 Harriers could carry AIM9L, CVR7 rockets, and AGM-45 Shrike anti radiation missiles.
Hunter is useless at 9.7.
1 Like
Side note:
I have just found a source from NASA that could Nerf the F-18C AOA and Buff the Harrier 2 AOA at the same time lol.
2 Likes
I have found a vehicle that is crazy broken in UK and that is the Venom the energy retention and turn is creazy
1 Like
Yes the Venom is beautiful but its Br is too high
I know 😪
I have been a main of the UK for 4 years and have all the tanks all the helis and all the planes its just sad to see the trend of how manny vehicles are in the wrong Brs and bad nerfs on the UK over time now UK got a great jet that is known for its exceptional maneuverability and speed and acceleration and they throw it to the ground
Yes and they give all the buffs to a french knockoff lol.
I also have France on another account and the rafale performs much greater in speed and climb and high altitude than the EFT at the moment and i love all the Eurocanards but that is not right its just not the Rafale is not a F15 E or a Typhoon or a f22
1 Like
No its supposed to be slower in speed and acceleration.
1 Like
I know but i dont whant to attack the Rafale i love the Rafale as a Greek , but i love the Rafale for what it is and the EFT for what it is not for what they are not
Both aircraft are phenomenal IRL. There are few planes that can match them.
However they still have strengths and weaknesses.
1 Like
Exactly the EFT is an air superiority platform with performance the rafale is an Omnirole with amazing multy capably but master of none and the Gripen is kind of both but less in some
1 Like
Yep and the Rafale in game can hit Mach 2 with a full weapons load…
1 Like
It wvwn has 4 AOA difference istead of one from the EFT and turns with 17 Gs
That would destroy any aircraft in the sky today.
1 Like
LERX isn’t a indicator of whether a Harrier is a GR.9 or a GR.7.
Trials on older GR.7 fuselages showed they wouldn’t support the 100% LERX because they didn’t have the structural modifications later production fuselages had, that allow for one. So they weren’t retrofitting on any serial below ZG477 (or below JFH tail number 67) when converted to GR.9
There were GR.9s with both 65% and 100% LERX, as there were GR.7s with both 65% and 100% LERX - the proportion of 100% LERX planes just increased with the GR.9.
The “frog eye” fire extinguishing inlets are usually a better indicator for older airframes, as those were retrofitted on all GR.9s except the trials aircraft ZD318 and ZD320. The planes that supported 100% LERX (ZG477 and above) came with them from the factory.
3 Likes
I see so still have to wait for Gr.9 to get brimstones on a Harrier.