Fair enough, the Mk.107 for a Gr.7a would solve this issue lol
Or we don’t fix it, so we can justify another harrier instead, then fix it later
There would be 0 difference apart from the engine though.
Well, they aren’t fixing the targeting on this one, they might on a new one. 😿
Doubt it they hardly fixed any of the things I brought to their attention.
14 minutes of fuel = 2200lb which iirc, was about the max the Gr7 was rated to hover at, with no stores. so add on stores. lowers that further.
So being below 14 minutes of fuel when you try to land on a carrier and you should be golden. Especially if you are heading towards the carrier at or around that fuel amount, let alone for when you are actually at the carrier
1 Like
Handy information, cheers.
1 Like
Free when ever you are, playing some GRB for the Raiper so just DM me in game when ya need me
1 Like
Does that MiG-23 have R60?
A test with R60 would be interesting
It’s got R-60MK
(This is a complete sentence)
Prefect I sent you a friend request in game.
accepted
T10 is pretty decent got to say
Takes 8 flares to beat a R-60MK while evading anything less will likely hit…
That’s really stupid.
quite excessive seeing as you get 15 shots of flares
And 4 go to a single missile lol
1 Like
not as bad for GR3 as you don’t really need chaff but for the FRS that sucks
2 Likes
Still a MiG-21 can carry 4 of them, you will die before he runs out.
1 Like
At least we can reversal a mig pretty consistently now