Avoiding Hypocrisy and the Double Standard - US Abrams to the Chinese Tech Tree

This one is pretty simple. The Chinese tech tree should not receive the American-made Abrams. Or Gaijin should add the VT4 to Japan this update despite any potential Chinese player backlash.

If one part of the War Thunder player base is able to push for the denial of their MBT going to a nation that did received it (either through purchased or through a defense agreement), and indeed prevent such from happening. Then other sections of the player base should be able to do the same. Setting politics aside here, adding the Abrams to China highlights a clear double standard and hypocrisy.

And to pretense something here, the existence of vehicles like the F-16, Apache, and Mirage [I would argue] in the Chinese tech tree is irrelevant in this particular because the issue is the double-standard. Since the announcement of the Abrams going to China in a prior dev letter/community update there have been plenty of comments and posts pointing to this particular issue.

41 Likes

Them giving China an M1A2 is just them shoving copy/paste into a nation than putting any effort into fixing it. It’s the lazy way and it doesn’t help the tree.

Adding this just means they ignore fixing domestic vehicles for longer than they already have.

16 Likes

They just need to add the VT4 already. Now would’ve been a perfect opportunity.

16 Likes

Opposing M1A2T to China would be hypocrisy and double standards.

Supporting it is supporting consistent standards.

@Bioticas2817-live
Iran isn’t USA.

@Ion_492
M1A2T isn’t in any other tech tree in War Thunder, it isn’t copy-paste.

8 Likes

Iran doesn’t operate any J-10s what?

4 Likes

They aren’t even adding the ROC flag. Get real, they will go deaf ears on this unless there’s some concentrated effort.

5 Likes

Well your source is either dodgy youtube channels or a dream, because Iran hasn’t been offered, nor had any J-10s delivered

I’d love to see the Thai VT-4, but it was never confirmed nor denied to be coming to WT by Gaijin officially (as far as I’m aware).

But this update would’ve been a very good time to add it!

4 Likes

It cannot be acceptable for one portion of the player base to pressure Gaijin to not add their nation’s MBT to another nation and have Gaijin follow through while not allowing anyone else to do so is the issue or to flat out dismiss it. Which has been the case.

And the M1A2T is just an M1A2 designated for Taiwan. They are basically the same vehicle or “copy and paste” in War Thunder terms. Much like the M1A1 AIM is just an M1A1 designated for Australia. But that could potentially be a solution to the issue here. Gaijin could add the M1A1T to the US tree as an event or premium and that would not involve them adding the VT4.

Not saying it is the best solution but it would be a solution.

11 Likes

Such a thing has not occurred.
Gaijin’s response was zero denial of Thai VT-4.
And no, M1A2T is an export [no DU] Abrams SEP3 modified by request of China.

And no, China is a tech tree in War Thunder.
Chinese vehicles should not enter the United States tech tree. EVER!
China is a tech tree already.

2 Likes

AH well, I’d still be fine with it if the US got something

Agree to disagree.

1 Like

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

I meant pertaining to China

Literally not a single possibility besides pakistani block 52

Then I have to disagree with the addition

??? No one made this much of a fuss when the F-5E or F-16MLU was added, why now?

1 Like

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

5 Likes

The hypocrisy brought attention to it, and I’ve seen some people complain about the F16 copy and paste

1 Like

What? There isn’t a single german tank/plane/heli in the entire tree, tf is that analogy

1 Like