I think people forget how pisspoor the early harriers performance actually are
If they got fixed/buff sure. But SHars with Aim-9Ls and radars are very hard to play at their respective BRs. With only Aim-9Gs and no potential future buffs, they’d basically be unplayable.
For example this is what the Harrier’s were like IRL when it comes to defeating missiles:
Sea Harrier Over the Falklands by Sharkey Ward
but in game IR signature is based upon thrust:
So basically Defending a missile in a Harrier is a pain in the butt due to game limiations. If that was fixed. Then sure, they could move up quite a lot.
Lot of cm = 18?
Compared to other 10.0 and 10.3 thats more than them which have none
the hunter and GR1 harrier are at 9.7 with only SRAAM and no flares. ww2 jets face late Korean war jets. complaining about imbalance in this game is like saying water is wet. we know
They dont have flares.
Swiss hunter harrier GR3 and both av8 have flares, i think he meant to say the GR3
I did not create this thread for your benefit. I created it to share feedback with the developers.
Bro, I’m just trying to help you in keeping your thread unlocked…
No…
Pretty sure Mirage IIIE doesn’t have a gunpod…
A-4 Ayit: Countermeasures, missiles, AGM’s, GBU’s, significant bomb load, …
9.3 in RB, 9.7 in SB.
i mistyped, it was very late at night. I’ve corrected the comment
Yes 9.3 with AIM-9Bs and an infinitely worse flight profile. Not 8.7
Those are internal cannons because if you take SEPR rocket motor, that space is taken by the oxidizer
Ah… my bad then. Fixed it