I think it’s br is proper, it simply just needs a reload buff is all.
2 Likes
Gotta keep the thread going for traction, seeing as people are getting the Aubl 74 HVG out of the silver crates now.
1 Like
I agree. It just needs a better reload and it’ll be fine.
1 Like
Gaijin most likely won’t give it, because it’s Italian, or, rather they want documents for it apparently. Yet vehicles are balanced along their reload times.
Hell if even be happy with a 4 sec load time
1 Like
specifically documents of “dokuments)))” variety
1 Like
I’d really like to find a document regarding the total shell weight
i suppose its this one
1 Like
Is that m300? Where Tf did you find that?
a quick google search for “60mm hvms ammunition”
also there is that crappy janes scan
and that picture is from a forum thread
2 Likes
How the hell is the manual loading 5-6 rnds a minute?
Must be tf or the Vcc-80-60
It’s a 13.2 lbs complete round. This thing would be super easy to load with one hand
Turm III is only .3 br higher than this, and is vastly better lmao….
They really need to bump the Turm III and fix the reload rate of the Aubl to be 4.0 at worst.
1 Like
that made me raise an eyebrow too, tbh it looks like a completely arbitrary number
https://www.ebay.com/itm/205682747568
apparently thats the brochure from which the number originates from
4 Likes
Hopefully common sense will prevail
2 Likes
I think it’s for the Vcc-80/60 given it’s an auto loader.
But the weight of m300 is nothing compared to a pak43, which on the Puma loads as quickly as 4.9 secs I believe
1 Like
Probably is, the L23A1 76mm gun on the FV101 with ~7.5kg complete rounds also has 6 rounds a minute ROF in official documentation.
1 Like
common sense is not associated with the snail im afraid
2 Likes
I wonder if they think the gunner also loads the cannon on the Aubl? I’m almost certain that would be the commanders job.
The pak puma at 4.7 shares the same 6.0 sec load time, with a much larger shell, both length and most likely weight wise.
Both have a dedicated loader…
Just one is Italian, so yah know, can’t have anything but torture.
Especially given that the Aubl is one of the slower 8.0 light tanks
well…
at this point there is no excuse for them to keep the glacial reload time for the AUBL
edit:
THIS THING HAS A STABILIZER??? AT A LOWER BR WITH A FASTER RELOAD???
2 Likes
Is this a joke? The freaking Aubl 74 HVG is already terrible. But now we have this?
Like am I crazy or is this just horribly balanced? The 60mm HVG cannon reload needs a buff, nothing crazy but like cmon!!!
@Suggestion Mod.
From the dev server
2 Likes
My god, a 1 sec buff! That’s better! But still not great. Being only 0.3 br under the Turm III, plus having a vastly smaller shell with low weight, it shouldnt be any longer than 4.5 secs when aced.
Ideally, 4.0 secs
1 Like