Tell me why does Sweden has a Finnish Mig-21bis, a Finnish T-72M1, Finnish T-34, Panzer IV, etc. They are all literally copy paste from another nation, it didn’t stop gaijin on adding them there, why is the rule for britain different?
7 Likes
The rules should be the same and the copy paste from Finland should be removed.
You know they are never doing this, they made their choice, now we gotta cope with it.
4 Likes
Its a suggestion straight out from the old forums, it was just like that. Besides its a French Mirage, Modified by Israel… its quite on the other side considering that its a vehicle that has nothing to do with the Uk. Same thing with the latter Cheetah C, that’s basically a Kfir.
But if you want my honest opinion regarding sub trees, its going to be an absolute mess when vehicles like this are added. Does that mean other nations who have a sub tree (or a nation represented in their tree) should have access to all vehicles said nation had? lets say, Germany getting an Argentine Mirage/A-4/Canberra, Swiss mirages, or Italy getting Hungarian migs, etc…etc.
I don’t know, maybe its best to “draw” some line on the vehicles that can be added to the sub trees?
I don’t know why this is even still an argument. Every single other subtree in the game can’t have their ground forces matched against their air forces outside of a mixed battle, because they’re in the same tree. But when it comes to South Africa, suddenly it becomes OK? It’s the only nation with a full-on subtree where this is even a discussion. +1 for the UK, obviously, although at the end of the day I want to see South African air representation as much as the rest of you.
17 Likes
+1 for the British tree, they need a lot of fighter type planes at top tier.
Why is the French in Poll more than the other and why isn’t the British/South Africa not in a poll.
The Cheetah have no business being in the French.
This is literally not an option, at this point, it should go into British tree at this point, no it shouldn’t go the French or Israeli tree.
10 Likes
South African plane for South African sub tree in the British tech tree or it doesn’t come in at all and if anyone says it should go elsewhere then why do other nations with sub trees such as Sweden and China get to have their sub tree nations planes? British TT or not at all.
11 Likes
Was there not a statement denying a South African air tree in the British tree?
I can see them disregarding that stance of coruse but it will be interesting to see what happens.
Probably because it’s a modification of a French airframe…
As long as it comes to the game I’m not to bothered wether it will be in the French, British or Israeli tech tree myself. Why would you not want it if it is not in the British tech tree?
no one confirm or deny
Q. Could you clarify if it’s possible we will see South African Aircraft in the British tree too now that they have ground forces within their tree? Currently there is only the Rhodesian Hunter as a premium aircraft.
- The British aircraft research tree is already quite representative (five lines as opposed to four in ground vehicles tree before South Africa was introduced). South African aircraft may be added in another capacity - as a premium or event and squadron vehicles.
Ah yes. Perfect.
Sure nothing denied, even if, that could change, but saying ‘‘maybe added in another capcity - as premium or event and squadron vehicles’’, is not necessarily a reason to rave about the British tech tree being the only thinkable place for South African service aircraft.
I could live with late Columbian or Ecuadorian IAI Kfirs in the Israeli tech tree, with South African Atlas Cheetah in the British tech tree and ENAER Pantera in the French tech tree.
As long as Mirage IIIS/RS comes at all for example I would not care much beyond amusement wether it ends up in the German or French tech tree.
Looking forward to see what happens, also with the Gripen situation.
With the implementation of Swiss Hunter and F-16J everything seems possible.
Cheetah in German tech tree???
I think you’re misinterpreting the statement (to be fair, Gaijin’s wording isn’t very good here.) What they’re saying is that since British air already has five tech lines, they wouldn’t make a whole new subtree line like with South Africa’s ground forces. The “premium and squadron vehicle” thing doesn’t necessarily mean they’re going to add them as premiums to other tech trees, just that they weren’t interested in adding South African aircraft as researchable vehicles.
1 Like
Not quite.
everything should be in German cuz German
So is the Kfrir, what’s your poinit. People already had this argument, South African vehicles should not be in the French, since the nation itself is French Ally or have any common relations the to the French, the Nesher is based of the Mirage 5, why isn’t it in the French tree ?
The Cheetah series is based of both the Kfrir and Mirages, having more relations to Israel than it does to the French.
Your error of thinking, is MoDiFiCaTiOn Of A fReNcH aIrFrAme, doesn’t mean it should be in French tree.
There is a lot French vehicles that can be added and the Cheetah is not one of them.
2 Likes
You missed the point.
It should be placed in the British Tech Tree just as other South African vehicles are in the Ground Forces Tech Tree. The Atlas Cheetah should definitely get added ingame in Britain.
+1.
8 Likes
This shouldn’t be an argument and is straight forward
This is a South African vehicle and should go to the South African Sub-TT. It’s like saying all American leased vehicles by the Soviet Union should be in the American TT (which it’s not).
Besides that it’s a +1 for me (UK TT addition)
7 Likes
New news about sub-tree tech because of the debate if I feel like it needs posting here:
6 Likes
M8 just give it up it’s going into the British now weather you like or not SA is a sub tree of Britain so any further SA vehicles will go in there.
2 Likes