ASEAN Founders Ground Sub-Tree

Suggestions Ground
66

It might be, Singapore and US have much more closer ties than Japan and China

67

possible, however as a US player, i do think vehicles should be considered on a case by case basis for this. the F-15SG in particular would have a place in the US as it uses JSOW operationally while US strike eagles probably can carry them, but dont

their F-16’s would be largely pointless as we already have F-16’s that do the same thing, their leopards would just take away from the uniqueness of US top tier ground

70

Japan definetely but china is more or less the same as USA

1 Like
71

How so? Looking at the Malaysian stuff, most of their equipment comes from Germany, Sweden, the UK, and the US. The OPVs you mention on the flip side are indeed a joint Malaysian/Chinese design, but they were not deemed successful, and the remaining 14 ships of the Keris-class will be built according to German and Dutch designs instead.

As for Singapore, once again, their equipment comes mainly from the US, Germany, Sweden, France, and Singapore itself. They have very few ties to China on a military level, so it really seems odd to put them as a sub-TT to a Nation they have little to do with. Plus it seems the vast majority of Singaporean players disagree with the notion from what I’ve seen

3 Likes
74

It also makes sense. But apparently the current United States does not need a Singapore subtree.

3 Likes
75

In most aspects i mean
If we are talking about your standards then everything should be added to germany, USA and USSR

76

this is true, and why you will only ever see me asking for the F-15SG, not a full subtree

1 Like
78

other than ships, also MANPADS, UAVs, motorcycles, army trucks and so on
more than japan at least

1 Like
80

Is there any difference between the F-15SG and the current F-15E or F-15C?

81

in that case where only F-15SG is added to USA
but if full singapore tree then either uk or china(good job not spam reporting them, keep it up)

1 Like
82

i agree wholeheartedly

1 Like
83

different radar, uses AGM-154 JSOW, has an IRST

also has the general electric F110-GE-129 engines, i think 400ish pound better in thrust on afterburner, but 7-800lb less thrust thean the PW-229 on regular power

1 Like
84

Sounds interesting. I can already imagine how much annoyance gaijin’s stupid auto-switching IRST would have bothered this plane :)

1 Like
87

see, this is interesting, by most standards the US should have the subtree, but the US does not need a full on Singaporean subtree, since everything except for 1 or 2 jets is the same as what we have ingame already in US tree

88

Better radar and FCS maybe?

90

idk what you mean by FCS but yeah, better radar than the strike eagle and eagle ingame

91

He probably meant to say RCS

92

Probably not Germany; even then it’s still a joint design with mostly Chinese systems aboard. They could probably add the remaining non-Chinese ships elsewhere since it seems Malaysia was displeased with the base Chinese design.

1 Like
93

radar cross section would be the same between both, same airframe

94

If Malaysia go to China according to this statement than it more probably go to Germany, almost half of the vessel in RMN are from Germany LOL

2 Likes