Koreas should be united
ASEAN should be added individually
Thailand, indonesia and philipines(maybe to USA) to japan
Malaysia+singapore to china/uk(for malaysia, if only Su-30MKM gets added, to russia, for singapore if only F-15SG gets added to USA)
For those who are planning to,
Please don’t abuse the report system just because i said “Singapore should go to china”
Great to combine with other subtrees then, is it not?
Haven’t looked into their vehicles much, but I do remember it being a few more. For example Laos is an export customer for a very interesting ground launched TY-90 SAM.
But even if there wasn’t anything else, that is a Bangladesh situation where it might as well be added anyways since it doesn’t need much space, might help in unexpected places and brings possible future procurement from these nations to the tree as well.
I also forgot Myanmar in the original message, and keep in mind these are all in addition to Pakistan, and very likely at least North Korea.
I agree, but I also believe if Gaijin won’t do that a combined subtree for China is the next closest to such a tree.
There have already been hints they plan subtrees, and this way they wouldn’t be split.
Depending on the Korean players opinions this might be an alternative to what Chinese players want from Singapore, offering even greater capability to the Chinese tree.
1 Like
To be honest, I still don’t see the connection between Malaysia and China. Aside from that one ship class of four ships (remember, there are 18 total ships planned) that was designed in China, there doesn’t seem to be much connection outside of that.
Aye, that, too. Plus, as much as most people would rather ignore the existence of Naval, it still exists, and Pakistan is China’s only real hope of having more than one 5.0+ Light Cruiser.
2 Likes
That’d be amazing, China has some pretty interesting naval options so it’d be nice to see them finally get their naval trees.
Aye, most of the Chinese Naval tree will likely be Destroyers. There’s also Ping Hai and Ning Hai, which, sadly, will probably take the cake as the worst CLs in-game. Without Pakistan, China would be limited to only one decently competitive Light Cruiser (an Arethusa-class); however, with Pakistan, they’d also be able to get their hands on a Dido-class as well as a couple of other British Destroyers to reinforce their TT further.
3 Likes
China still have other nations to add which more suitable than Malaysia and Singapore, like the Nigeria, Tanzania, Albania, Eygpt and etc, so stop saying the things like “Malaysia and Singapore should go to China”
1 Like
I thought I replying bbbdddaaa 😅 seem like I tagged the wrong person
China still have other nations to add which more suitable than Malaysia and Singapore, like the Nigeria, Tanzania, Albania, Eygpt and etc, so stop saying the things like “Malaysia and Singapore should go to China”
4 Likes
Nigeria
Not the best option since Nigeria also has close ties the UK and the USSR initially and Turkey more recently though it’s not the worst option either. Would make more sense to add Nigeria to the Chinese TT if they get a Pakistani Subtree ontop since their relationship with Pakistan is closer weapon procurement wise
Tanzania
Fair enough, China and Tanzania’s relationship is rather close
Albania
I can see the thought process with this one since Albania was very close to China for a little while however the main issue is that when the inventible breakdown of the Sino-Albanian relationship it broke down hard. Not helped that Albania doesn’t add anything new or interesting to the Chinese TT aside from some goated skins
Egypt
I have to object to this. Yes they do operate quite a sizeable amount of weapons of Chinese origin however they also operate lots of equipment from several nations including the USSR, US, Italy, France, Both Koreas, UAE, Brazil and even Spain. My other major objection with Egypt being part of China is for the simple fact that if we are going to get a TT involving an Arab nation it will definitely be Egypt paired with Syria (both are part of the same country even for a short while), Sudan (Refer back to Syria), North Yemen/Yemen and Palestine.
As far as other options China could have is probably Venezuela though there some problems with that
To be honest, these countries have a much more distant relationship with China than ASEAN…
1 Like
I’m pushing the American TT and have already finished the Russian TT, so I can enjoy it wherever South Korea and some countries here go, haha.
K2 and SEPv3 abrams would be a very interesting lineup
The K2 seems to be the full upper position of the Type 10, which is better protected, more firepower, and more powerful than it. I’m looking forward to it coming out, no matter where it is, as long as it’s not in Japan.
1 Like
F-15K, F-15E
K2 and Abrams
pretty nice match up imo
Stuff like trade ties, historical relationship etc
I still have yet to hear the stupid reasoning behind why malaysia should be in japan
1 Like
Still no reason to spam report my posts just because you disagree
And for the other nations you say should be added to china:
Nigeria and tanzania: yeah nigeria should be in china
Albania: To balkan TT.
Egypt: middle eastern TT OR soviet TT or Chinese TT
Japan can have thailand, phillipines and indonesia which have more vehicles than nigeria and tanzania combined. Also just that china can have other sub trees does not mean malaysia and singapore shouldn’t go to china
1 Like
Well, yes. But those are not everything China can get, so it should not be the standard, epecially considering that China (combined PRC/ROC) on its own has more potential than Japan already.
Considering the backlash that has come with Singapore it should go to the far end of the line of potential subtrees.
There have been many nations brought up, like Bangladesh, Cambodia, Egypt, Korea (just North or even both), Laos, Myanmar, Nigeria, Pakistan, Tanzania, Venezuela. So long as players from these respective nations don’t also object it, these should all be considered way before Singapore is, where players have spoken out against it.
5 Likes
China doesn’t need Singapore, there’s only a Leopard 2 and an A-4SU as the primary unique vehicles, neither of which offer anything for China that they don’t already have; meanwhile both add things Japan lacks.
Go beg for German military equipment for the German tech tree, not the Chinese one.
No, it shouldn’t. There just physically isn’t enough vehicles.
China also needs a sufficiently strong MBT and a good CAS. In particular, Japan has far surpassed China in CAS. Your reasons are lame.