nobody cares naval :)
also we haven’t seen a naval sub tt now
F-15K has AN/APG-63v1 currently on F-15C though, and has IRST and can carry SLAM-ER
itll be lower BR than SG so they fill different purpose in US
the A-4SU could be interestig but i want A-4N and M for USA first
But, haha, no one cares about the Navy. China doesn’t even have a naval tech tree.
Oh but what about middle Eastern f15? Aren’t their f15 like literally better?
u mean F-15SA and QA? not anymore, but they used to be better than the F-15 of USAF
they are advanced eagle aircraft, like the new F-15EX, they have FBW and since it freed up space, they have an extra pair of wing hardpoints. the SA has APG-63v3 on SG and upgraded USAF C’s, and they have a MAWS and upgraded ECM suite, and has the IRST the F-15K and SG
the QA has the APG-82v1 found on upgraded USAF E’s and the EX, as well as nicer cockpit displays. other than that it is the same as the SA.
the new EX has EPAWSS, which gives it better ECM and more countermeasures, as well as the better Legion IRST pod and nicer cockpit, the APG-82v1 radar, and carries AIM-120D and GBU-53 which no non-US F-15 carries. i dont know if JASSM-ER are exclusive to US but if they are, then F-15E and EX are the only two that carry it. It is important to note, however, that the F-15EX current has no MAWS
Well i guess those f15 could be premiums instead
Honestly, except for the Malaysian part, yes. Because I just want to get Singapore, after all, there are alternatives for both the PT91M and the Su-30MKM. But together they want to get Malaysia’s star vehicle. So, you’re right on that.
2 Likes
i think they could be squad event or premium but yeah, its unlikely they will be in main tree
Is it? I thought those are the only Soviet product on the market which used all Western system
I mean, there are alternatives on the game character. For example, the PT-91M can be replaced by the T-80UD (6TD-2), and the Su-30MKM can be replaced by the Su-30MK2 or the J-15/16. But in terms of the uniqueness of the vehicles themselves, they are truly unique and attractive.
3 Likes
If Myanmar really enters the Chinese technology tree in the future, then the Su-30SME is also very good.
2 Likes
Singapore makes sense but Malaysia?
Will it having downgraded radar system?
No. Both the Su-30SM and Su-30MKM radars are N011M.
I never saw anyone in Chinese community talk about Malaysia PT-91… even this vehicle is unpopulur. in fact, i never know Malaysia bought it before.
Singapore could give China TT Leos and Eagles, just like Malaysia could give Japan TT Soviet-like tanks and Flankers, is what they can’t have with native productions.
But yeah, only few players cares these domestic WW2 or cold war vehicles.
A western FCS or computer usually won’t affect the performance in game. It still have Flanker FM, Russian armaments, and the autoloader with 7.1 second reloading time.
1 Like
Yeah, it still can do that, just don’t mind those paveway and yeah it just a Russia plane
No way, Gaijin won’t allow a TT who get Leo, Abrams, T-80, F-15, F-16, Su-27 and Su-30
singapore are argulably much closer to china
Wah lao eh🥶🥶🥶
https://www.instagram.com/p/C_LC4vLyyqS/?igsh=bXBuZ2ZtY2llNWI0
I don’t see Singaporean jets flying with Chinese air force. Ik they only like sea exercise and counter Terrorism exercises but compare to japan it very lame excuse to bring singapore to china but most importantly Singaporeans rather their country to be in japan rather than in china. You can say singapore and china share something something but it up to Singaporeans to decide where their country should be, not foreigners (I’m just sayin ✋🙂🤚)
10 Likes
Unfortunately, it’s not entirely up to you. Because the reality is very obvious: from the point of view of ground forces, even these five countries (among which Thailand has already entered Japan) cannot all enter Japan. Who will be spun out? I don’t know, but it’s highly likely that the four countries are relatively closer to China. The answer is obvious, isn’t it? Or you can still convince yourself that Japan will get five countries as a subtree, so that there is no reason to discuss it with me.
2 Likes
Why countries with nato/blufor military equipment have to go to a country that use opfor equipment? Wouldn’t be more sense for blufor nation go to well blufor nation? Like yk what i mean?
2 Likes
I’m telling you about the results considered from the point of view of game balance, not real military politics. From the perspective of game balance, it is impossible for Japan to get five countries that complement each other’s weaknesses in every aspect as their subtree. If Japan gains five countries, and more than half of the vehicles are not Japanese, can this TT still be called a “Japanese TT”?
3 Likes