What lack of evidence?
There’s circumstantial evidence of China being involved with MTEs; though I’ve always suspected any images provided of being mockups.
There’s evidence the program existed.
The only evidence lacking is them on aircraft, and project cancellation.
Sadly people defend Kh-38MT staying on equally baseless feelings; Only images of mockups and paper has been shown thus far.
I have no skin in the argument of it staying or going personally.
There is not.
There is no evidence of them being on anything other than a sheet of paper.
You got a source for that chief?
There’s evidence the program existed.
There’s evidence the project went as far as mockups and marketing brochure.
And 95% of players say the xm246, Gepard, and ZA-35 are op, yet they’re still severely under br’d
Thats really unfortunate. Gaijin usually does a great job of Getting fake or messed up stats out of the game. But here we are
Yeah i was apart of ot it had 7k+ comments and it got locked
Please be honest and tell me yourself that you actually believe that missile does everything they say it does with 0 proof to back it up? What about the bug reports and information released on the AGM65s that are ignored? Or the fact that we dont get AGM114Ls? If NATO had 30% of IRL weapons Russian mains would cry every single day 😂😂
The lack of ever being used? Lol if that was a real weapon we would have been made aware of it. But its fake a Gaijin coping on the Russians again
What?
Too many people sadly believe that.
They’re militant in it wanting to stay despite not having evidence to back their beliefs, and they’re militant on wanting it removed despite not having evidence to back their beliefs.
Then there’s me, I have zero claims about the missile personally. I have zero interest in it being in the game or not because I only ever used it for air sim convoy hunting, and custom battle testing.
Even if the Kh-38MT stayed it’d have its seeker nerfed and be unusable in air sim anyway.
So no matter what the Kh-38MT is a dead missile to me, so I have no skin in the argument of it staying or going.
Dude, you’re not making any sense.
You made some claims, and were asked to back them up.
I explicitly stated there’s no evidence of the weapon being in service.
And you’re getting mad that I stated that? Really?
I can’t prove there’s no evidence when there’s no such thing as evidence of no evidence.
And the only other things in my posts are me repeating another person’s post which has a Chinese export document, which isn’t my claim.
@Just_Baron @PyroAddict @HOMINUSNOCTURNO-live @PaulsBackPack @Neekolodian73029 @Leinadmix9_ツ @MikeyPlayzonYT
Thank you all for coming to agree with us about Kh-38MT’s lack of evidence.
Glad we’re all on the same page.
???
p. s. I don’t care about the missile other than its removal or a nerf to drag it into a leveled field.
Dude, all I see is us agreeing there’s no evidence of functional Kh-38MTs being put on service aircraft.
If there’s no evidence of
Then there’s no evidence of such missile working at all.
By the logic you’re appealing to, the US has a hypersonic cruise missile, it just lacks the evidence of being used on different platforms.
Alvis just ragebaited everyone and you all fell for it lmaooo
No. I won’t play those games with you.
You made specific claims. You are being asked to back them up.
You said, and I quote :
There’s cirumstantial evidence china tested them
That is vastly different to the reality, in which some mockups were at an air show and mounted to an aircraft. That’s not tesing, that’s sales.
There’s a difference between rage and calling out false claims. :)
