Ah yes… another comment on how NATO players have bad takes.
By all means, tell us how Russia’s the best in the world again like you have countless times.
That or I’m remembering someone else from a topic you also were in.
Casino_Knight is a Britain main, your nonsequitur doesn’t work here bub
1 Like
Glad you agree with me that Casino Knight is a Britain main.
I really don’t understand how people can never find out what the word nerf means in relation to video games in a video game forum by the way.
Nerf: to reduce the effectiveness of (something, such as a character, attribute, or weapon) in a video game
the AAM-3 has reduced effectiveness from real life because the developers have chosen not to implement the multi-spectral seeker
cope
5 Likes
You misread the definition.
“in a video game”.
No where does it say “from real life to a video game”.
Development of simulations takes time, if you think you can code in multispectrum IR seeking by all means do so and offer to sell the code to Gaijin.
it’s nerfed in the video game compared to real life, which is why it is undebatably artificially nerfed, everything else you have posted is just semantic cope to avoid the blow to your ego that being wrong would be
5 Likes
Nope… no mention of real life. Only a mention of in video games.
Your posts started misusing a word and the posts got called out on it, I defined the word, and later you posted the definition I provided you with a bit more words.
Also constant attacks aren’t healthy for discussions.
Things being inaccurate is not a nerf.
Mig-29 having higher fuel consumption than real life is not an artificial nerf, that’s an inaccuracy.
Tho to your previous posts it’d be an artificial nerf… cause reasons.
It’s still not one tho.
“It is an artificial nerf but I’m still going to say it’s not one because I don’t want to be wrong”
thank you for conceding that you were wrong buddy
1 Like
Inaccuracies aren’t nerfs, they are separate words with separate meanings.
Not sure why this is difficult to understand.
you’ll grow up some day kid
4 Likes
dude, those are artificial nerfs because despite having valid documents proving that inaccuracies are present in the game gaijin still refuses to implement those changes.
The will of Gaijin to not improve certain things that will align them with the real-life stats while simultaneously buffing things that aren’t so good in real life (Ex: Russian ERA) can be considered as an artificial nerf
1 Like
Things not being in-game currently isn’t the same as refusal to develop things.
Some things are low-priority.
Mig-29 using a bit more fuel than it should isn’t as big of a deal as Mirage 2000’s countermeasures still increasing repair costs, or armor bug reports.
Things take time, and there’s an order of priority for the bug fixing team.
Then there’s features being worked on that aren’t here yet.
Overhauled AI being the first one on mind. Radar cross sections & separate flares & chaff are also stuff we know is in development.
We also suspect there’s another dozen things in development.
Also Russian ERA isn’t buffed.
Kontakt 1 is correctly bad.
Kontakt 5 is correctly perforated by DM53 [tho War Thunder’s less than ideal perforation simulation represents this as bounces sometimes, and metal plates causing issues].
And Relikt correctly resists DM53.
We are both players on the same side of wanting to have fun & enjoy a game that’s accurate.
DCS took a decade to get some of the basic features it has today like correct atmospheric density, a feature that War Thunder got around the time of English Electric Lightning’s introduction.
We should breathe, take a step back and reflect on what we have in this game, and what’s to come.
Then think on how Gaijin’s dev team will juggle all this coding.
How is R*ssia put on a pedestal when the T-90M turned out to be crap and the Leopards are buck breaking everything right now?
Did you Google Merkava? , if gaijin doesn’t want the Israeli tree to be normal, he can remove it
i m so sorry russia did not get the best tank in the game but calling the underperforming 2A7V OP isnt right it may be better but its missing armor also you still have the 80BVM which still outperforms most
3 Likes
You’re delusional if you think the fully spall lined leopards aren’t currently the best tanks in the game.
He could go make a bug report that say “Uhm actually the T-90M has ERA that can withstand a nuke and it uses darts that penetrate 100 Leopards in a row” then say the source is “trust me bro” and Gaijin probably will believe him.
2 Likes
No, not close.
It is the best.
It is not really that big of a deal to spray the M61 against most subsonic jets, let alone against small aircraft like the Me 163 or Sagi II, because you can keep bnz forever to make them bleed their speeds.
In fact, I sometimes take my F-104A for clubbing peoples, but most of the time I have no problems at all against aiming against subsonic jets, and even in full uptier games I have no problems killing F-5 spammers or Mirage IIIC/IIIIEs that are more manuverble from 104s.
All-aspect missile carriers are likewise not a major problem when flying the F-104A. The A-10, A-6E, and Su-25 are basically slow, so you just need to be careful in positioning against them and stay fast enough to outrun the missiles.
If you are having trouble killing the enemy with your F-104A, I can only say that you have a massive skill issue. The only horrible thing about playing the F-104A is that my all teammates gets wiped or when the MiG-21SMT/MF is on my 6.
Anyway, the F-104A, EEL, MiG-19s, J-7II having the same BR as late subsonics such as the Hunter FGA.9 and J32B is just a laughing bag that definitely cannot be justified.
2 Likes
His post is hard to read.
2A7V is as competitive as Strv 122 & T-90M, while not as armored as the 2 names, it’s still the 3rd most armored name, 5th most armored tank, and has the best round & maneuverability.
Definitely part of the meta, but none are “OP” or all are if you’re of that perspective.
Also T-80BVM cannot overperform as it’s the 9th tank in armor protection, behind China’s 3 MBTs.
@NoBottersInARB
One word: Rudder.
F-104’s rudder weakness makes dodging their gun extremely easy, if you have no problems using F-104s, it’s cause you’re facing players that don’t exploit your rudder.