Why do you say “Leopards” in plural? Even less so “fully-spall lined”?
Only 2A7V has got spall liners in the hull sides (not even in the front, besides the lower left side). The others only got on the sides of the turret.
Is that what you call “fully-spall lined”?
the only liner i can see on the 2PSO is on the turret roof but that could be just me not seeing the rest
Strv 122A, B, and B+ are all Leopard 2s.
Because sweden has leopards and you’re objectively wrong.
I used the plural term because there is more than one fully spall lined leopard.
Fully spall lined leopards:
Leopard2A7
STRV122A
STRV122B
STRV122B+
i would honestly like an option to remove every armor in the armor view exept the spall liner
Called it.
You shouldn’t insult others though.
Your posts before this weren’t great for discussion.
Your existence isn’t great for discussion RazerVon.
also where are the liners for the challys 1 and 2s or am i blind
Eila_Deker was talking about (Germany’s) Leopard 2A7V and its missing armor…
And your response is to talk about the “Swedish Leopards” (Strvs)?
Like, uh… ok…?
Where in the world is the F-104 rudder a weakness?
It is not as badly compressed as a Scimitar and not bad as MiG-15s on high speeds.
And since there is no skill based MM in this game as far as I know, whether you fly an F-104 or I do, there is not much difference in the skills of the players you will face as enemies or teammates.
Or you are just tremendously unlucky compared to everyone else and you gets elite squad as enemy team when you play the F-104A everytime for somehow?
the 122s are in my eyes better because of the better hull and M95 has better spalling compared to the DM53 while the 122s are also faster than the 2A7V so i would not call it the best but some do for some reason
Its funny bc everytime you post something no one understands you except razervon XD
I just know Tornado IDS WTD 61 it might be prototype of Tornado IDS ASSTA 2
Why air-to-ground armament better Tornado IDS ASSTA 1 in research tree ?
Hey @Stona_WT ,
Sorry for pinging you in the weekend. I know it’s the weekend and part of the dev team is celebrating christmas, but I wanted to ask a question (if you know the answer):
The reload of the 120mm Abrams tanks was buffed in an attempt to increase the effectiveness of these tanks. However the last 2 days very much look like the screenshot I attached in terms of battles. In particularly the SEPv2 feels worse to play than the other Abrams tanks.
I was wondering if the devs, based on the updated statistics, already have any further plans for the SEPv2 to make it feel worthy of playing over the SEPv1, like giving it M829A3 or making TUSK II a modification?
Also, even though I disagree with the decision on the DU hull armor, I think that the blog was really good and I love the transparancy.
Merry Christmas to you and everyone at Gaijin.
Lmao. You’re still perpetuating this lie? After dozens of times I’ve shown it to be false.
& maneuverability.
I want to know what you’re smoking ngl.
you are correct about “nerf” but its not what they are talking about, they are saying “artificial nerf” that’s an important distinction. it has a different colloquial meaning in the context of this forum.
Challenger 1 hasn’t been given them
Challenger 2s have them in the turret and the front of the hull only
Challenger 3 (TD) only has them in the turret
Also worth noting:
in the KNDS (formerly KWM) the maker of leopards, the NEW Swedish 123C is internally called Leopard 2A7 SWE.
Meaning that the new not yet made Swedish tank is more comparable to the current 2A7 than the current Swedish tank is. So the German 2A7 in war thunder should definitely be the same armor (if not more armour) as the 122B since the 122B is just a front hull enforced 2A6 without the upgraded main gun.
we all know Gaijin wont fix it but will give the 123 its full armor while the 2A8 will 100% not get its full armor when both get added
What’s even better, that @A_Cute_Chihuahua isn’t even using the license that authorizes DU in Abrams hulls for making this point. Look at the license number this clown posted.:
He’s trying to claim SUB-1602 has anything to do with SUB-1536. He’s a clown and completely wrong. I wouldn’t worry about him, Necro. :)
