Stona, the post is incredibly tone deaf and is just a bumble of words that the devs hope will calm people down in time for the christmas pack sales. I can bet this was written a week ago, but wasnt released until now to make sure the playerbase cant get mad in time to boycott sales again. Dont be surprised when people get a bit peeved at this nothing burger of a response post.
44 Likes
WHAT?
That armor was literally made by IDB
26 Likes
AGAIN,…
We’re asking an OVERALL change to protect some lower BR ranges that are completely failing to improve the player experience due to an inexpected and Imbalanced issue between Attack aircrafts and Fighter aircrafts.
The game is currently so painful that it is literally possible to not do a single kill in a F-86F-2 (BR 9.0) when constantly fighting aircrafts such as the premium A-10A early.
The current A-10A can destroy without any problem 2 of the F-86’s in the game with 99%kill probability, then it can use it’s superior maneuvrability, tankiness and firepower (30mm GAU-8) to shred any threat.
Or let’s talk about MiG-21F-13 and it’s cousin the MiG-21 PFM superior ability to get away from the guns of the F-86’s
Those are only 2 exemples, i can do it for the whole BR set, let alone the problems around 11.0 and 10.0 with so much technology differences that the BR doesn’t mean anything.
The game is currently so compressed that the airbattle is mostly composed of Premium players,… which is not going to create a good image of the game → That’s one of the multiple reason why community think of WAR THUNDER as a Pay to Win game
18 Likes
So if a bug report gets too old, then it no longer gets looked at?
3 Likes
Gaijin try not to provoke the community again challenge IMPOSSIBLE
43 Likes
lol They made players angry again
15 Likes
Oh my apologies, It might’ve been a bug? I had received a notification linking to my comment and it displayed your message. It left me confused, sorry.
The report is before the recent changes. Elements of its steering and gears has been changed recently, so the report will need to be updated if it is still incorrect. Its currently out of date. The existing reports that were forwarded on the matter have been fixed.
Many of the reports on the list of reports you linked have also been fixed or resolved now too. Some are also duplucated. So the list itself is out of date quite a bit.
1 Like
Halt/Delay works on future updates to work on improving/fixing existing vehicles and balancing issues
- Yes
- No
0
voters
20 Likes
Like lmao do you guys actually not learn the whole “Merkava’s don’t have spall liners” is making me laugh so hard lmao
23 Likes
Not it’s C hull, D turret.
The 2A4 in game is B hull and turret.
15 Likes
I look through the list reguarly, and many of them havent been fixed yet. I shall do another check tonight, but as far as I am aware, none of the bug reports concerning armour, ammo locations, etc have been looked at yet
1 Like
Yeah, it’s time to uninstall the game for another 3-6 months.
Between the continuing Russian Bias bullshit and the absolutely blatant disrespect to the other nations again, I’m out of patience again.
38 Likes
Hi! and thank you for your patience with people that start tossing out less than clean words if they don’t get things that they exactly want.
That being said, will we ever get answers for why specific sources for these issues were rejected?
i’ve seen MANY sources for both L2A7V and the Abrams armor (both online info and published books, exaple: Answering your concerns regarding spall liners, MBTs and Aircraft - #60 by Count_Trackula example2: Answering your concerns regarding spall liners, MBTs and Aircraft - #31 by FurinaBestArchon) and so far no reason given for any of them not being good enough to use as sources.
The only answer we have is “will not be implemented” but not really a reason WHY, given the amount of sources it seems rather arbitrary at this point even for me as a person not well versed in the subject.
So a more detailed explanation of each source is at this point almost required to even get close to start calming people down.
(sidenote, any comment on my previous post? Answering your concerns regarding spall liners, MBTs and Aircraft - #20 by Necronomica )
Edit:
@Smin1080p ?
29 Likes
Like I said - nothing. Geez, they even said that the M829A3 won’t give any advantage. It’s known to easily penetrate the top part of t72b3-t80bvm, but Gaijin will make it so it can’t penetrate those tanks, lol. Of course it won’t be effective because you won’t give it any real effectiveness! And about you being stuck with your 90’s sources I don’t feel like saying anything about it .
24 Likes
Ahh found the issue, TES appears to work correctly, OES does not.
They will never stop working on future updates because they need their “fresh new thing!! and new premiums!!!” to distract everyone from the problems every few months
3 Likes
Congratulations Gajin, I will stop playing your game now, you are obviously biased against the Russians and reject any armour development related to NATO tanks! The top tier is an unbalanced madness and you do nothing against it! It’s sad that this is where the game is!
31 Likes
They use whatever source that agrees with what they want to do in the game
31 Likes