Well ya see…
K-1 Wasn’t effective against KE
K-5 was mildly effective against KE.
Relikt ERA is very effective against KE. (According to the MoD)
M829A3 with specific Anti-ERA tip is not effective against ERA.
How was this not obvious to you???
26 Likes
“Resistant to 30mm APDS”
“Oh Da,da we get it, 30mm effective KE”
STANAG protection levels must be like Sumerian cuniform to the devs
25 Likes
Please see the answer as explained in the news article:
1 Like
So the mantlet armour is getting fixed?
5 Likes
Turret traverse has finally been adressed earlier, hoping more reports will get through with Challenger’s and Ariete’s.
1 Like
Its just historical lol. Its fixing a nerf
1 Like
12.7 is NOT enough. There is no planet were the current crop of 11.3s have any business facing the 12.3 craft. All the 12-.3 aircraft ruin the experience for anything flying 11.0 or 11.3. Please consider an actually jump in BR up to 13.3 so there’s room for many of these jets to breathe with decompression.
The premium Tornado should go to 10.7 and bring the IDS MFG back with it. Neither of these aircraft have any business facing F16 and Mig 29s, especially with a broken FM, incorrect chaff amount and a lack of ECM/TSPJ pods.
SB needs a new bracket for current 12 and 12.3 aircraft. 11.0 to 12.3 is absolutely nuts and not enjoyable in the slightest.
11 Likes
I understand that you can be upset, because you do not like the answers you got, but that do not justify rule breaking behaviour many of you have started to vent your frustration.
This is War Thunder forum and this forum was created for discussion, not to throw insults and swears on Developer team or other users, who got different opinion than you.
Please focus on topic and do not break rules.
Thanks!
15 Likes
give it more 50. or a MK19
It’s not a matter of opinion, it’s Gaijin refusing facts to artificially nerf specific vehicles.
44 Likes
Not sure this is fixed lad?
2 Likes
Im sorry but this is retarded. The tank layout and shell weight affect the reload. This poll is just rage
Thats a historical reload for the abrams. If you have basis then of course its valid, but currently your only basis is “Waaah thats unfair”
5 Likes
At the moment, there are no open reports on it. So if there are other issues, they have not yet been properly reported. All of the reports on it were fixed.
1 Like
So we probably are not going to get spall liners for Leclerc?
After having armor fixes denied off of a document showing a prototypes armor?
After having rate of fire denied off a single source known to make errors?
It’s hard to not take this as blatant prejudice against us France player.
36 Likes
Nice job gaijin, really good solution! keep ignoring the people that literally pay for your bread, and instead ejaculate unnecessary, unwanted, never-asked-for ideas just to piss us off more and more. you are good at that.
I do not know what else do you want. YOU brought in unnecessary vehicles when we just wanted the game to be fixed and more user friendly. People did not even want those vehicles because they knew for a fact you will implement them wrong and piss them off. And surprise surprise, YOU DID.
Nevertheless they took from our own time and worked hard to do YOUR job and look for legitimate sources and asked legitimate people to help revert your implementation of such vehicles (such is the case with the 2A7V/2PSO/Abrams) but you still ignored it all and somehow brought some of the most idiotic answers i have seen this year.
WHAT DOES IT TAKE TO GET YOU LISTENING TO YOUR COMMUNITY AND STOP BRINGING SHIT OUT OF NOWHERE?
62 Likes
This post is complete joke. How do you even dare to start Leopard 2A7V section with words
“We always try to bring the characteristics of vehicles presented in the game as close as possible to the documented characteristics of real vehicles.”
When you nerfed its maximum speed without improving acceleration which was one of the MAIN points of 2A7V upgrade? The part about armor is just bizzare.
Section about Abrams is just mumbling and sand in the eyes, no structure at all “something something new round, something something it is bad anyways, something something no improved armor” and bla bla bla
What about spall liner for Abrams? Why did you not mentioned it? You think people forgot or what?
55 Likes
Gaijin shouldnt be surprised people are angry with their no compression anwsers when we are leaving feedback on it for years and its all being ignored with some bad take anwsers too.
26 Likes
You guys did a lot good things in the recent year with how you handled the Roadmap and the changes you brought with it.
But you guys seriously need to work on the game balance and the sources you use to provide vehicles their real life values. The fact that you very obviously underarmor modern vehicles, just doesnt work anymore it just is so much more obvious when you look at the Strv122 and Leopard 2A7V. You cant use a 20year olds study to armor a 2019 tank.
Either way with how you guys are handling the game balance my Steam review is going online once again. And i am considering quitting the game after getting the Vilkas and then it might stay up there.
You guys cant continue on the way you are handling modern vehicles
61 Likes
Wait where did I curse or insult people? I’m more than happy to revise the message
3 Likes