Inaccuracies & bugs aren’t nerfs.
Preventing FG1 from going to 11.7 with EJ Kai isn’t a nerf.
@AUSChalkWarrior
That’s not what nerf means.
Stop moving goalposts, stop copying me.
@Necronomica
Also not what nerf means, and the one thing that entails is reload speed & repair speed.
The actual quote.
Also, physics dictates that a spinning missile can’t hit peak G for its entire rotation.
It’s annoying watching NATO haters block all NATO players & fans that try to improve tech trees that aren’t Russia.
Could you please explain how moving to 11.7 would affect the phantoms? It mostly still has to play against the top tier so what’s the issue there?
I clearly see what kind of sentiment you like to carry in this discussion and arguing with you is just a waste of time
see no more points from him apart the good old nato hater bs
Dude, I support decompression.
It would change everything if they went to 11.7.
You stated that there are no artificial nerfs in the game. that’s the end of the discussion
look at you, scurrying around throwing everything you can desperate for something to stick because you realise that right from my first point i dismantled you completely, classic tell-tale sign of abundant cortisol levels in low-testosterone male - the quintessential display of TERROR and FEAR.
Pigeon chessboard.
No nerfs have been listed, no citation of changelogs, no citation of datamines.
And the ones that never cited their sources claim they won…
You provided no sources.
Just let him cook those funny arguments
its safe to say i won here
It’s another day of “RazerVon and the tale of the worst takes”
I’ve seen this one before though
Ah yes… another comment on how NATO players have bad takes.
By all means, tell us how Russia’s the best in the world again like you have countless times.
That or I’m remembering someone else from a topic you also were in.
Casino_Knight is a Britain main, your nonsequitur doesn’t work here bub
Glad you agree with me that Casino Knight is a Britain main.
I really don’t understand how people can never find out what the word nerf means in relation to video games in a video game forum by the way.
Nerf: to reduce the effectiveness of (something, such as a character, attribute, or weapon) in a video game
the AAM-3 has reduced effectiveness from real life because the developers have chosen not to implement the multi-spectral seeker
cope
You misread the definition.
“in a video game”.
No where does it say “from real life to a video game”.
Development of simulations takes time, if you think you can code in multispectrum IR seeking by all means do so and offer to sell the code to Gaijin.
it’s nerfed in the video game compared to real life, which is why it is undebatably artificially nerfed, everything else you have posted is just semantic cope to avoid the blow to your ego that being wrong would be
Nope… no mention of real life. Only a mention of in video games.
Your posts started misusing a word and the posts got called out on it, I defined the word, and later you posted the definition I provided you with a bit more words.
Also constant attacks aren’t healthy for discussions.
Things being inaccurate is not a nerf.
Mig-29 having higher fuel consumption than real life is not an artificial nerf, that’s an inaccuracy.
Tho to your previous posts it’d be an artificial nerf… cause reasons.
It’s still not one tho.
“It is an artificial nerf but I’m still going to say it’s not one because I don’t want to be wrong”
thank you for conceding that you were wrong buddy
Inaccuracies aren’t nerfs, they are separate words with separate meanings.
Not sure why this is difficult to understand.