The despicable game makers turn a blind eye to everyone’s opinions and only design all kinds of data certified by authoritative organizations according to their despicable thinking, saying that the source is unreliable and the most despicable game companies will only make it up.😅
4 Likes
My prediction is that with the current politics of War Thunder regarding the artificial nerfs of certain vehicles the game will fall more and more into the category of arcade and unrealistic World of Tanks rather than the simulator like Steel Beasts. They don’t even try to do cutting edge level research themselves and come to us, to the player base and ask us to prove certain things. That’s your job war thunders devs, not ours and if you ask us to do the research then be kind and implement fixes accurately and in reasonable period of time. Just because Nato tanks with DU anti ERA rounds can destroy in frontal arc every Russian MBT doesn’t mean that the game should turn into WoT. Just put the top Russian tanks in it’s appropriate BR and that’s it. That’s the life, not everything is equal in the real world in terms of capabilities
4 Likes
There are no artificial nerfs in War Thunder outside reload rate on tanks.
This isn’t a historical battles game.
is that you razervon?
7 Likes
yes its him
explains the comment
3 Likes
Explains me being factual & pro-NATO yes.
the AAM-3 is objectively artificially nerfed and thats the first thing i can name off the top of my head in 30s
AAM-3 has not been changed in a negative direction since introduction. I know this cause I use the missile, no artificial nerf.
AIM-7M is nerfed too and the Radars of some Jets too when locking targets close to the ground
1 Like
the multispectral seeker the AAM-3 has in real life does not exist in war thunder, therefore it’s artificially nerfed
try again mate
3 Likes
Chally 1,2 incorrect armor values, Abrams not having DU in the hull, sad state of Starstreak missiles, no 9L missiles for the British Phantoms, not implementing Top US round. What I mentioned is just the stuff I play and there are more nerfed things, I am sure. Isn’t these enough as evidence?
3 Likes
Stingers pulling 13G with all sources saying 20G but sure no artifcal nerf
7 Likes
That’s normal behavior for PD radars.
AIM-7M & R-27ER not hitting low targets is better than you think, whether it’s accurate or not.
13Gs instead of 10Gs is a buff, not a nerf. And there’s math involved with Stinger G limit
@AUSChalkWarrior
That’s not a nerf, that’s at most an incomplete introduction.
@Pegasus7217
None of those are nerfs, none are artificial.
USA has a top round, it’s called M829A2 and it’s the 2nd best penning round in the game.
None of you knows what a nerf is so I’ll define it for you.
Nerf: A negative change for balancing purposes.
It has to be a change from one state to another, and it has to be in a negative direction, otherwise it’s not a nerf.
ah yes thats why the Stinger when it first was shown had 20G but gaijin used a source for the Russian Igla to nerf it to 10G
6 Likes
you claim there are NO artificial nerfs
i present one that is plain as day and is not implemented because it would be overpowered
“nuh uh that’s not a nerf because i say so”
the circus is in town clearly
4 Likes
You presented a missile that in the datamines has not been nerfed since introduction.
Dataminers > your claims.
I’m glad dataminers exist cause it makes fact-checking nonsense claims extremely easy.
the AAM-3 has a multispectral seeker in real life
it does not have one in war thunder
It is artificially nerfed
stop shifting the goalposts mate
4 Likes
giving a missile less than what it should have is artificaly nerfing it
Honestly though. I’m seeing German, Britain, and China mains just straight up insulting US mains for battling for their tanks having proper armor. Parroting over and over “You guys only whine, we had it worse.”
Like why the f_ck are we fighting each other? Isn’t it Gaijin that f_cked all of our tanks?
10 Likes