Why is the AMX 10P chambered in 6.3mm while the Sub-1/II is chambered in 5.3mm? For better mobility, a higher rate of fire, and the same ammunition. The AMX 10P is only slightly more armored, but a 12.7mm round will destroy you in any case. so amx 10p 5.3 maybe for a logical tank
The Sub I-II is simply better. Better mobility, better rate of fire, better muzzle elevation and depression, even though it has a BR of 5.3 compared to the AMX 10P, which is much worse at a BR of 6.3.
2 Likes
Are you talking about their battlerating rather than caliber per chance?
11 Likes
When he started talking about chambered BRs, I turned into the gunshop owner in Terminator 1.
2 Likes
battle ratiing yeah sorry for the error
Because the AMX 10P has scouting and a crewless turret as well as empty space rear which you may think the sub 1-2 has empty space but spalling WILL hit the gunner what I’ve been saying to my friends is it should be a light tank not a Spaa
Okay, but the AMX 10P doesn’t correspond at all to BR 6.3; it would need to be downgraded to BR 5.7 minimum, or BR 5.3 would be ideal. Furthermore, the AMX 10P’s turret isn’t completely unmanned; just shoot the cupola and everyone dies.
Yeah, who makes an spaa with gun elevation of 50 degrees max?
Could probably drop down to 6.0 BR.
look the sub 1-2 it’s literraly the same think much much better but 5.3 just the sub it’s quitly less armor and the sub have 80+ elevation
i didn’t care about br 6.3 and not 5.3-5.7 if sub 1-2 are in 5.3 it’s not legal
phased plasma rifle in the 40 watt range
2 Likes
10P has better armor, better optics, larger belt size and scouting. So that “package” would probably make it higher BR.
Not sure what scouting is “worth”, which is why I said drop to 6.0. Maaaaybe it could go down to 5.7…
And you could also make a case the Sub I-II is a bit undertiered and could go to 5.7. Currently it has the same BR as the U-SH 204 GK, but I’d say the Sub I-II is a better vehicle.
One of reason why SUB could be 5.3 is due to its armor, even 7.62mm MG could easily penetrate that, the gunner is not protected, and the ammo is also not protect which means you can even use 7.62 to destroy its ammo. I wish it could get scouting, as AMX-10P
u-sh doesn’t have dm63
This topic just makes me want to go play the AMX-10M. Enjoy that thing. Even if Spookston and Oddbawz had a big whinge about it (lol, I know, who cares about CC, was felt weird how much they disliked a 7.3 ATGM machine that is actually fun to play with a ATGM that can dispatch whatever it faces).
Which is why I suggested U-SH and Sub I-II should NOT be the same BR.
SUB could probably be moved up to 5.7