almost as crazy as F-4M/K same BR as F-4S…
Or the Kurnass 2000 which everyone seems to have forgotten being the same BR as a Netz Mod
Hey fool, go read the conversation. It’s not my problem you are unable to comprehend simple statements.
tiger tank vs this guy
whos winning
5 Likes
Tiger_Tank_1.
at least he is acting gentle to everyone
6 Likes
100%, he knows when to shut up at least.
Or actually explain his point instead of being vague as hell.
Good, I am happy to seeing that you dropped most braindead idea.
No sacarsm.
I am dead excited to see that you are still ignoring friends from the Commonwealth. :|
IF There is a proper tech manual and documents which can be used for support ‘extra countermeasure installation’ of F/A-18C Early(USN), I might be fine with buffing F/A-18C Early(USN) Since Gaijin made premium of F/A-18C Early (Swiss) by bringing F/A-18C Late and artificially nerfed loadouts to make them nearly-identical to F/A-18C Early(USN)
If you don’t have any? nah…
3 Likes
The bug reporting forums are free for anyone to use
1 Like
Truly one of the takes of all time on this forum.
5 Likes
hell naw one of the kings has arrived.
This entire discussion has just be children yelling “no u!”
2 Likes
I don’t care about your feelings. Don’t wanna be butthurt, do t be soft and more importantly, don’t be blatantly wrong.
Already did, not my problem you can’t comprehend. Stop acting like a clown
Go read the damn conversation and figure it out. You want to participate, then you need to read up on what’s been said. Not my job to educate you fool
Considering the f18c hornet was used by us forces, yeah I don’t think it’s out of the question…
Only thing you could educate anyone on would be getting killed without contributing lmao.
1 Like
Can you please prove the fact that they are different? Show us an video.
Go look at the x ray, you have the game figure it out. If you needed me to provide data that you couldn’t find yourself I would. This is trivial and not my problem.
A Child or Children?
Can you clarify your stance on this problem?
Your reply sounds like “a bunch of children gatekeeping a proper buff, which F/A-18C needed to get with no proof at all. While a single adult made a proper suggestion without proof.” because you wanted to silently side with OP.
That is what I am talking about. You got crossfired by a bunch of people because your original take was blatantly wrong, and you acted like you couldn’t comprehend whether you can or can’t.
Also,
Acting aggressively wouldn’t help with the discussion.
You are turning people who possibly could be on your side if you successfully persuade them into being hostile.
1- Do you have any solid proof that USN F/A-18C Early got equipped with 120CM in that ‘Specific block’?
Well, with Gaijin’s babysitting policy named as Technical Compatibility, there is a chance of giving USN F/A-18C 60 extra CM, but I don’t support that way without any proper proof.
2- Then CF-188A, which is used by the Canadian forces, still remains sucks and being 60CM while F/A-18C of USN gets ahistorical buff without technical proof. I am extremely frustrated about you still ignoring Canadian Hornet, which acts exact same as USN Hornet bc nothing, but it isn’t helpful for getting buffed.
3- In case you have solid proof, then submit it as bugreport. As I claimed earlier, if you have solid proof or documentation about that, I won’t mind you guys getting buff.
They are not bad they are good at 12.7 the win rate is so bad because mostly new players buy them
1 Like
actually they are one of the best 12.7