OP and some folks cared
Funny how the minor differences between the USA and Swiss F/A-18s is some major issue that should put them at different BRs, meanwhile sitting quietly in the other corner of the 12.7 bracket we have the F-15A/J/Baz… it’s almost like the BRs have a bunch of different performance aircraft compressed in together or something… Nah, must just be my imagination.
While CF-188A gets forgotten in NEARLY EVERY COMPLAINT TOPIC
(Probably because CF-188A isn’t better than their precious F/A-18C in any aspect. frustrating.)
I still remember some of those even asked American exclusive AIM-9X in their 18C Early because of 60 extra countermeasures (he got bombed hard and eventually changed his stance to 9M but still…)
TMI: AFAIK, there were minor options that the F-15A/C should have a lower BR than the F-15J/JM, since the AAM-3 is better than the AIM-9M before.
Spec difference between 9M and AAM-3 probably bigger than 60cm, though.
Some complaints are understandable, this one wasn’t.
Honestly, tired of topics like this since the introduction of the Swiss prem F/A-18C
Oh really?
There is correlation between nation and rarirty for sure but it ain’t that big. Mere 21% between American and Swedish MLU… Then there’s Swedish first F-18C that performs just as badly as German and American ones…
Care to explain?
You are 0 and 6 my guy, try again.
Sorry but I’m talking about the climb rates of the vehicles this thread is about, you can harp about turn rates of totally different aircraft elsewhere.
U mean 6 and 0, u have proven nothing by just saying that stats don’t lie.
The fact a bomber has armor plates in the stats doesn’t mean it has good survivability, the fact a tank has a determinated top speed in the stats doesn’t mean it can’t go over that top speed, and the fact a plane has better climb rate than other in stats doesn’t mean it has actually better climb rate.
U literally haven’t showed nor proved ur arguments are correct.
U’re nobody to tell me what to do, so i will talk about anything i want to since ur knowledge about stats is extremely limited.
this thread is worthless atp
Yet every single example you’ve made has proven your argument wrong lol.
The SU-25 begs to differ.
I regret to inform you that no tank in game can exceed it’s listed top speed when driven on a standard level test track. No, dropping the vehicle off a cliff does not mean it can normally exceed it’s top speed.
Shame then that you continue to provide me with examples that state otherwise.
Pot calling the kettle black. Please though, stay in your bubble, its fun watching people like you squirm.
Very, its just the same few people making hollow arguments defending the current situation.
There is no valid reason so far to not bring the CF-188A and 18C Early into line with the 18C Late, especially given they share identical prices currently.
If u believe a Su-25 is a bomber i will start calling u “bot”
Wrong again from ur part, any tank can exceed it’s top speed by jumping from a cliff, i have done in the Tiger II and other heavies and i’m always able of exceeding my own top speed thx to GRAVITY, the same thing that makes something heavier (Swiss Hornet) than other thing (american Hornet).
U have proven nothing till this point, u just say “it has better climb rate” and never prove u’re right by checking it somewhere.
It’s annoying to watch dumb players think they’re right cuz the only person that believes in their arguments are themselves, cuz till now nobody has proven u’re right.
The only person who has proven my arguments are wrong is u, and u have zero credibility cuz ur arguments have no sense nor have been checked.
U just say the first thing that gets out of ur mind and call it a day.
Shame then that it has the same spawn cost as any other bomber aircraft.
Thank you for proving your total lack of reading comprehension since I already stated that such is not indicative of the actual max speed of a ground vehicle.
Gravity does not equate to the mass of a object, gravity is a force exerted on a object.
You should go and look up how delta V works.
Oh no, I only proved the climb rate of the F/A-18s in question, you proved your own argument false multiple times now by quoting examples that supported my own.
Sorry but “No I don’t think you are right” does not omit the facts that are present in the game and readily available both in the datamines and live game itself.
Well then, thank you for admitting that your arguments are flawed and that I have proven you wrong.
With your newfound free time, I would encourage you to learn how to at least use a spell check.
Regards
i’m tired discussing with an idiot like u, u’re top 1 dumbest player here in the forums, multiple people could get that title for not giving proofs of their arguments being right nor even being gentle with people that explains everything in a good way, but i believe the only one acceptable for it it’s u.
congrats for being a bad player, i’m blacklisting u.
i dont think you’ll look any smarter by insulting him like that
Ok, so just admit you’re wrong then, pretty simple.
says the one who has never admitted his wrong and just said things like this
oh and specially this one.
Jesus christ, the brick wall is back
It’s alright, you have nothing useful to say. Still wrong, and still useless.
You feel confident that you’re right just because you had your little gang try and back you up. It clearly hasn’t registered that even with your gang you’re all still wrong.
The worst part is that he only came back when i was in a bad spot, ignoring the worse spot he is atp of the conversation.
“I’m right and you’re wrong
I’m done with you
go sit out of this conversation”
That is what you have said in almost every message in this topic.
you really need to go back to english class and learn how to hold a meaningful discussion
Jesus goddamn christ,
@Hylian_Knights. Sorry for pinging but can you clean the mess over here? OP is now not discussing F-18 but throwing profanity at others.
I think this discussion has passed the point of no return and cannot have any positive effect on the community and the F/A-18C itself.
