No!..In the USSR/Russia-there is also a “captured technique”-as you wrote …
Briefly…
Bro they already get paired together lmao
I would say yes, but only if it would be a niche thing. Giving America something like the MiG-29 or Su-27, despite them using it, would undermine the actual MiG-29/Su-27 in the tree that it is from. Maybe something like the Me 262, since it would be more gimmicky than anything in the US tree (why use it over the F-80) but not something that’s outright good like the King Tiger or MiG-23MLD (that’s the one at the museum). Gimmick vehicles maybe, but not something that would upset balance extremely.
Ie. Me 262, Panzer IV, StuG, maybe? T-54, maybe? But not something that is the “top dog” of the country it is from like the MiG-21/23/29 or Su-27, or King Tiger.
Besides the precedent this would set is for everyone to get everything, and in some sense it would ruin the asymmetry of combat that makes the game what it is. No one likes to fight their own vehicle.
US air suffers so much because people are unable to make difference on how to use a P-38, a F-4U and a P-47,…
It suffers because people are bad,… the quality of gameplay have fell to the ground,… and now they’re starting to dig in with their Jet engines.
–>i want for proof the number of Jets Players that are still crashing at takeoff,…
This is completely wrong to think that the problem is vehicule based,…
But don’t get me wrong → this is the same problem for EVERY other Nations in the game today.
I think he was being sarcastic
I think that i’m not having tone when reading ^^"
hey if the Soviets got an F-5 I would not mind it, also, I never said “captured technique”
You mean a F-22 right ^^"
Yes and no, America is already a large tree, America did test most of these, one example is the Messerschmitt P.1101, but just because they tested it doesn’t mean it should be added, although some nations have had exceptions, like Sweden, who gets the Strv 105, AH-64A, Mi-28A, and the CV 90120 which were only tested, never used. So in short, some of these, but definitely not all.
Actually it’s a T-90A and yes it’s pretty likely to come actually, we’ve seen it on multiple leaks
The part people are confused on, I believe, is the full name being “T-90A (Trophy).”
Whether this means Trophy APS or like a trophy tank, as in “put it on display, we got their tank lmao” kinda thing, not really sure. If I had to guess, the second option is more likely
Could also mean a trophy as in a reward vehicle for an in game event or something, but I doubt that
The fact that people are not shooting this down and actually talk about this seriously makes me disappointed and saddened.
Ok hear me out here. N o. I am against captured vehicles being added. (Unless a famous example like the 190 that accidentally landed in Britain). I don’t want teams to be filled with premium players in their American MiG-29. It will ruin simulator completely, and be more copy and paste for RB. Also you can’t expect me to believe you’re wanting them added into the normal tree. That’d be ridiculous
I know that one of the MiGs was captured because the pilot accidentally landed and Israel and not Lebanon lol (I think it’s the MiG 17 or 19)
giving something like the MiG-29 or SU27 would actually be ridiculous, (I mostly use them just for clickbait), this is primarily just something that came to mind I haven’t put too much thought into it, so it’ll has a few issues
I’d take a premium American T-72S1 or T-72M1 but not like a T-72B3 captured, yk? Like a bad version of a vehicle.
Theres also a famous case of a MiG-15 pilot defecting from North Korea, so i mean that could be a premium but id rather it not
Its a little bit of a tricky subject but I certainly think they should get some of these. There is absolutely no reason the US shouldnt have their captured king tiger as it was captured in combat and is a unique historical event. I also think they should get a T34 given that they bought and tested one. 262’s and other war prizes that were taken back to the US for research I have to say Im against mostly because there are so many vehicles that fit that category that it would make Germany kind of redundant at that BR. Planes like the mig-17 and maybe the 19 have a place as they arent best in class fighters anymore and would serve as a more of a historical footnote about the 4477th who flew them as aggressor squadrons. As far as top tier stuff like mig-23’s mig-29, and su-27 absolutely not anytime soon. Maybe in several years when top tier air has progressed far enough that they would be in a position like the mig-17 is now, where its kind of a relic of the past.
I agree with the part of the tiger not being an event vehicle but meadals and lv100 ur more than likely already going to have the normal tech tree versions. IDK about jets but rn I’m grinding 3 nations and I’m already at ww2 with all of them… Although one of them Is Isreal.
being WW2 in 3 nations means: reaching an aircraft which actively took part in it.
so i’ll list for you the first of each line that gives access to WW2 ERA, and it’s Rank:
USA: i don’t take OS2U as they were used for Recon essentially
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/689902570172710959/1277982741916287100/image.png?ex=66cf25ad&is=66cdd42d&hm=7c24918f43a215874aea3213ea230acde030f34e587fc6235346e081bb5b0108&
Japan:
France:
China is a bit of a Mess, as they recieved aircraft from several countries, most of those continued service far after the end of WW2.
Israel had no part (directly i mean) in WW2, depsite using aircraft of that ERA.
Sweden remained Neutral the whole war.
